If something happen more than once then one may cautiously hint at a pattern of behavior. When it is so much familiar, ie the sun coming up in the morning then it is predictable in science and society it constitute a practice.
It is clearly a matter of the expectations of the society from the privileged untouchable class created by the PPP . Ramotar’s son, Repu’s son, Nanda’s son too privileges no less in their serious criminal infractions before the state.
If the young lady could not get acknowledgement in a criminal case and the young man walked despite the serious accusation of rape and aggravated assault while in possession of a fire arm, do you think she stand much of a chance otherwise in a system not geared for civil suits?
How can the society take back its authority if not rescinding the authority of the PPP? I think you would not want that. Preventing that is the reason you are here making the devils bargain daily and lying your ass off on their account.
In the US there are systems in place to address the issue or rape. Ask those indo boys who are ending up in Rikers or put out of their homes on account of abusing ( even verbally) their wife . No one is suggesting that there are not too many of these cases presenting but victims are not subjected to systematic neglect and political abused when they complain.
You have to be joking, in the US men abuse their spouse and the police don't even hold them overnight, they walk in a few hours and show up in family court a week later. Don't try to hold up the US as a shining star of women's rights. Canada is much more rigorous in this type of crime. It is a case of assault with questionable rape allegations. Don't know the laws of Guyana that well but it seems that the police did not have enough evidence to hold the man, not even an eyewitness. It was a he said she said story. The black eye is evidence of abuse but in no way shows that it was perpetrated by the suspect. It is circumstantial evidence at most.