Al, are you and dem Freedumb House bais lookin fuh free advice hey?

Jokes:

Nothing wrong with playing a lil devil's advocate, right ?lol

But seriously, if the PPP boys are still perceived to be complacent and corrupt next time around there will be a change in the executive branch--that's a strong possibility.

THE KEY TO THE PPP LOSING THE PRESIDENCY IS MOSES!

By the way, Moses is hellbent on making sure the PPP lose the presidency---the man hates Ramo with a passion---Granger and the PNC dont trust Moses---but Moses despises Ramotar and the PPP more than he despises Granger and the PNC.

Rev

Rev:

there is 2 big political assumption that cannot stand up.

1.  Ralphie Karran was never popular with the grass roots and thus will not make a difference in the political equation whether he is inside or outside the PPP.

AFC will look good on the books with him but he will not bring any constituent to the AFC.

2.  The PNC will lose votes.  Afro-Guyanese who did not like the PNC voted for them because of this message that the soldier boys spread  - "THE AFC WILL STEAL THE INDIAN VOTES FROM THE PPP AND THIS IS THE ONLY CHANCE FOR BLACKMAN TO RUN AGAIN"

This strategy failed and many afro-Guyanese are regretting they voted PNC when their politics is more aligned to the AFC.

I am convinced the PNC will max out in 2015 at 35%.  35% cannot win an election when the PPP will get 40%.

3.  The AFC is still not well organised and does not have a machinery that can generate mass support - trade union, country wide youth movement, country wide women's movement, village captains in all the villages.

4.  Guyanese voters are very cautious and will not chnage their votes enmass.  Many will change their votes but not 75,000 in 5 years.

The AFC need 75,000 more votes to make a difference.

This 2015 election is the PPP's Presidential victory but with less votes.

The AFC will be gaining seats in parliament while the apnu and ppp will be losing seats.

The big question how will granger deal with the stronger AFC. I honestly do not think granger will be there after 2015 since half of the pnc front bench are retirees and they will be gone by 2015.

The 2015 elections will be MOSES victory.

YOUR QUESTIONS AL:

NEXT QUESTION:

* Can a PNC/AFC coalition with Granger as President and Moses as Prime Minister defeat the PPP ?

THE AFC WILL NOT BE JOINING ANY PNC IN 2015.  The AFC will bruk up rather than join the PNC or PPP.

* How about a PNC/AFC colaition with Moses as President and Granger as Prime Minister ?

THE AFC WILL NOT BE JOINING ANY PNC IN 2015.  The AFC will bruk up rather than join the PNC or PPP.

Which combo is more likely to defeat the PPP ? Granger as Pres/Moses PM or Moses as Pres/Granger PM ?

THE AFC WILL NOT BE JOINING ANY PNC IN 2015.  The AFC will bruk up rather than join the PNC or PPP.

Rev Al and Mr Joker and Davin:

one factory you comrades are not recognizing.

The AFC finance men are abject Indo-Guyanese racist similar to Visnu Bisram message.

I do not think the AFC will join the PNC.

Ronald:

Thanks for the indepth response above---much appreciated.

You have imparted some serious political wisdom ---you are clearly intuned with political climate in Guyana.

In speaking to Guyanese in Guyana recently, many seemed contented with the status quo---PPP controls the executive branch; PNC/AFC control the legislative branch.

It would be interesting to see how many seats the AFC under Moses can pick up in 2015.

Rev

Nigel Hughes is a DUNCE!

And Politically he is a big fat zero---Nigel has no chance of ever winning an election.

If he is the AFC's presidential candidate in the next election he'll pull less than 10% of the vote.

RE: GRANGER

Ronald Narain believes he will be forced out from the PNC leadership before the next election.

Rev

Based on what the politicians are saying there is no chance of a coalition between the AFC and the PPP. What does this mean for the ordinary PPP supporter? It simply means a vote for the AFC automatically translates to a vote for the PNC. Story done!

Billy like you brains bruk or what?

If the AFC is not collating with the PNC, how the hell that mean a vote for the AFC = VOTE for the PNC.

Like u tun Janet Jagan now?

The truth is a vote for the PPP = vote for the PNC and I will explain later.

A VOTE FOR THE PPP = VOTE FOR THE PNC

why?

The PPP has now bought out the senior leaders of the PNC and APNU and they are in back room talks on how to distribute power and the benefits that comes with power.

This process was started when the PNC was in talks with the PPP on the Linden Electricity and in the process shutting the people out.

Luckily the AFC pull the PNC up and the rest is history.

Old people say, nah put cats to watch milk.

Mahen,

My brains maybe bruk but it is working better than most of the brains on this forum. Even a blind man can see the AFC and APNU working together in parliament against the PPP and the wishes of the Guyanese people.

My generation of East Indian don't see big bad blackman bogeymen coming to kill us like yours. So your race baiting don't matter anymore. Now is time for cooperation and working together. 

@ BILLY Ram Goat:

Mr Ramjattan Esq stated clearly that the party shall vote with the PPP when they do something good and against the PPP when the PPP does something bad.

The evidence shows that on Dec 17th, the AFC voted with the PPP on one of the supplementary budget measures and voted against the APNU position.

The AFC also voted against the PPP on the budget cuts. 

So haul your arse with your false propaganda.

The people who matter the working class know the truth.

My friend, do I need to remind you of the years you spent with Ravi Dev's ROAR working tirelessly to convince PPP supporters that they are not being protected by their party in gov't against the anti-Indian PNC?  The brutal attacks on Indians in Guyana goes on unabately and the PNC never condemns any of it. On the contrary, they provide legal support to blacks who carried out acts of murder against Indo-Guyanese. A perfect example of such support is Robert Corbin's public annoucement that the PNC will provide free attorneys to represent those charged with the massacre at Lusignan.

Shame on you Mr. Economist.

Dude...the PPP did not protect East Indians, period! The Jagdeo-Ramotar PPP is the enemy from within. The East Indian population has declined from 52% to 43%. The Hinhu population declined from 37% to 26% under PPP. The PPP has broken all the norms of governance and have opened the East Indians to vulnerability. You cannot talk about brutal attacks and not have a state-sponsored Inquiry. What has the PPP done to address these attacks and insecurities other than forming alliances and tacit collusion with drug pushers? Hence making it harder for the legitimate East Indian capitalists to do legal businesses. The PPP is the bane of East Indians. The Jagdeo-Ramotar PPP cabal is the enemy from within. Jokers like you, Ravi Dev, Bisram and Ramcharra fail to take this dimension into account. 

Please tell us "Who" the PPP did not protect Indians from?

TK did you say this:

The Jagdeo-Ramotar PPP cabal is the enemy from within. Jokers like you, Ravi Dev, Bisram and Ramcharra fail to take this dimension into account.

Did you call your old political MENTOR A JOKER - RAVI DEV?

Please explain thank you.

I hope by next Christmas you will not be calling Khemraj Ramjattan an a-hole.

Are you having reading problems? 

I was not attacking you, I was trying to save your arrogant ass since it is there for all to see that you called RAVI DEV a joker and I know that message will get back to him since he has many friends on this BLOG. 

The honorable thing to do, if you did not mean to call Ravi Dev a joker, is withdraw the comment.

If you are however denying that you did not call RAVI DEV a joker then you can be DEEMED an LIAR which make you BAD for politics and no better that Jugdeow.

The Jagdeo-Ramotar PPP cabal is the enemy from within. Jokers like you, Ravi Dev, Bisram and Ramcharra fail to take this dimension into account.quoted from TK

Then he tell me I have a reading problem.  The brass of some of these people.