Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

This is an old case since 08/04 and most of all it is an AUCTION,a kindergarden kid knows what an Auction is,most times sold to highest and best bidder for price lower than Market Value.They had their agreed share with the concent order and property was disperse of.Now someone is digging up ants nest,probably their 1/3 of their share is finish,Mr.Atty.have proof so bring it on.

FM

He represented her for 9 1/2 years, no problems, suddenly the property is up for auction and sold for $55M. Something gotta be wrong with her story. She's leaving out something involving the 2 other children. If they are entitled to shares and they consent then property is sold regardless of if she likes it or not. 

FM
Originally Posted by Conscience:

Being her attorney Ramjattan falsely gave the judge the impression that the woman was willing to sell and proceeded to sign the consent order.

 

The crux of the matter is that as an attorney he acted against the interest of his client.

The crux of the matter is that the PPP acted against the interest of the people of Guyana, and it is Ramjattan's exposure of that is why he suffers from these scurrilous and shameless attacks orchestrated by the PPP.

FM
Originally Posted by Gerhard Ramsaroop:
Originally Posted by Conscience:

Being her attorney Ramjattan falsely gave the judge the impression that the woman was willing to sell and proceeded to sign the consent order.

 

The crux of the matter is that as an attorney he acted against the interest of his client.

The crux of the matter is that the PPP acted against the interest of the people of Guyana, and it is Ramjattan's exposure of that is why he suffers from these scurrilous and shameless attacks orchestrated by the PPP.

Gerhard off with your nonsense! One time the PPP is the most incompetent then in the next instance you ascribe all kinds of supernatural and superficial powers to this very PPP. 

 

Funny is that every nonsense or illegality done by you people in the opposition is "orchestrated by the PPP". Its as though the opposition is comprised of sheer 'men of the cloth'

FM
Originally Posted by Conscience:
Originally Posted by Gerhard Ramsaroop:
Originally Posted by Conscience:

Being her attorney Ramjattan falsely gave the judge the impression that the woman was willing to sell and proceeded to sign the consent order.

 

The crux of the matter is that as an attorney he acted against the interest of his client.

The crux of the matter is that the PPP acted against the interest of the people of Guyana, and it is Ramjattan's exposure of that is why he suffers from these scurrilous and shameless attacks orchestrated by the PPP.

Gerhard off with your nonsense! One time the PPP is the most incompetent then in the next instance you ascribe all kinds of supernatural and superficial powers to this very PPP. 

 

Funny is that every nonsense or illegality done by you people in the opposition is "orchestrated by the PPP". Its as though the opposition is comprised of sheer 'men of the cloth'

I stand by what I said, albert.

FM
Originally Posted by Conscience:
Originally Posted by Gerhard Ramsaroop:
Originally Posted by Conscience:

Being her attorney Ramjattan falsely gave the judge the impression that the woman was willing to sell and proceeded to sign the consent order.

 

The crux of the matter is that as an attorney he acted against the interest of his client.

The crux of the matter is that the PPP acted against the interest of the people of Guyana, and it is Ramjattan's exposure of that is why he suffers from these scurrilous and shameless attacks orchestrated by the PPP.

Gerhard off with your nonsense! One time the PPP is the most incompetent then in the next instance you ascribe all kinds of supernatural and superficial powers to this very PPP. 

 

Funny is that every nonsense or illegality done by you people in the opposition is "orchestrated by the PPP". Its as though the opposition is comprised of sheer 'men of the cloth'

 You and your ilk are annoyed of Ramjattan's exposure of the PPP's corruption.

Albert you have no shame, but then again you are morally bankrupt.

Mitwah
Originally Posted by Conscience:

 

 You and your ilk are annoyed of Ramjattan's exposure of the PPP's corruption.

Albert you have no shame, but then again you are morally bankrupt.

So lemme get this clear pastor mitwah, you and Ramjattan are sin free right?

Ramjattan's wrong doings shouldn't be exposed right?

You are being scurrilous and  your attacks have become personal. There are three sides to the story. When you get your head out of your ass, you might see the light.

Mitwah

Ramjattan is now fiddling to deprive Twyon Thomas of the $6.5 million he was awarded after being tortured by members of the GPF. Thomas failed to turn up in court on 17 occasions and has apparently gone into hiding, yet his lawyer Ramjattan who initially claimed to be working pro bono out of human interest is badgering the AG to release the money to him.

FM
Originally Posted by Conscience:
Originally Posted by Mitwah:

Albert, how come you are posting when you should be working? You are a thief.

Unable to offer anything of substance to the discussion so you try to derail it with the irrelevant..........

 

Go worship your gods, Lord Khemraj and Shri Moses ........

Go worship Kwame's lingam.

Mitwah
Originally Posted by Conscience:

Ramjattan is now fiddling to deprive Twyon Thomas of the $6.5 million he was awarded after being tortured by members of the GPF. Thomas failed to turn up in court on 17 occasions and has apparently gone into hiding, yet his lawyer Ramjattan who initially claimed to be working pro bono out of human interest is badgering the AG to release the money to him.

Again, this exposes the shameless nature of the PPP.  Any payment to a client is made to the lawyer, regardless of the terms of representation.  Moreover, this payment will be made publicly.

FM
Originally Posted by Gerhard Ramsaroop:
Originally Posted by Conscience:

Ramjattan is now fiddling to deprive Twyon Thomas of the $6.5 million he was awarded after being tortured by members of the GPF. Thomas failed to turn up in court on 17 occasions and has apparently gone into hiding, yet his lawyer Ramjattan who initially claimed to be working pro bono out of human interest is badgering the AG to release the money to him.

Again, this exposes the shameless nature of the PPP.  Any payment to a client is made to the lawyer, regardless of the terms of representation.  Moreover, this payment will be made publicly.

Albert is being stupid as usual.

Mitwah
Originally Posted by Gerhard Ramsaroop:
Originally Posted by Conscience:

 

Again, this exposes the shameless nature of the PPP.  Any payment to a client is made to the lawyer, regardless of the terms of representation.  Moreover, this payment will be made publicly.

Ramjattan was yesterday 'privately' badgering the AG to release the cheque to him during a side discussion in the lobby of parliament.

 

The victim in this matter was apparently paid off and left the jurisdiction so my question to you is; why is Ramjattan who claimed to have offered his services pro bono still interested in obtaining this cheque?

 

Could it be that he has been instructed by his client to do so?

If that's the case why didn't Ramjattan urge his client who was absent on 17 occasions, causing the case to be dismissed, to go to court?

Did Ramjattan facilitate the 'paying off' of his client by the tow accused?

FM
Originally Posted by Conscience:
Originally Posted by Gerhard Ramsaroop:
Originally Posted by Conscience:

 

Again, this exposes the shameless nature of the PPP.  Any payment to a client is made to the lawyer, regardless of the terms of representation.  Moreover, this payment will be made publicly.

Ramjattan was yesterday 'privately' badgering the AG to release the cheque to him during a side discussion in the lobby of parliament.

 

The victim in this matter was apparently paid off and left the jurisdiction so my question to you is; why is Ramjattan who claimed to have offered his services pro bono still interested in obtaining this cheque?

 

Could it be that he has been instructed by his client to do so?

If that's the case why didn't Ramjattan urge his client who was absent on 17 occasions, causing the case to be dismissed, to go to court?

Did Ramjattan facilitate the 'paying off' of his client by the tow accused?

All that you have said here amounts to conjecture, which you yourself have made clear by the use of words such as "apparently" and "could it be", all framed as questions.  Nothing you have said negates the fact that it is the lawyer who is paid.  That Ramjattan is enquiring into the payment simply means he is doing his job on behalf of his client.

FM

 

All that you have said here amounts to conjecture, which you yourself have made clear by the use of words such as "apparently" and "could it be", all framed as questions.  Nothing you have said negates the fact that it is the lawyer who is paid.  That Ramjattan is enquiring into the payment simply means he is doing his job on behalf of his client.

This is a very good attempt at dodging pertinent questions Gerhard. And what job is Ramjattan doing on behalf of which client? Ramjattan is on record as claiming that he did not know the whereabouts of his 'client' Ger..

FM
Originally Posted by Conscience:

 

All that you have said here amounts to conjecture, which you yourself have made clear by the use of words such as "apparently" and "could it be", all framed as questions.  Nothing you have said negates the fact that it is the lawyer who is paid.  That Ramjattan is enquiring into the payment simply means he is doing his job on behalf of his client.

This is a very good attempt at dodging pertinent questions Gerhard. And what job is Ramjattan doing on behalf of which client? Ramjattan is on record as claiming that he did not know the whereabouts of his 'client' Ger..

Even if that is the case, wouldn't the public handing over the cheque serve as an incentive for the client to come forward?  Yes?  No?

 

Moreover, the cheque being deposited would earn interest for the client as well, if he takes long to show up.  The Gov't holding on to it only symbolises their badmindedness.

FM
The PPP did a lot better at robbing the public hence the minority status of their gov't. Now they begging for snap elections. They should just snap out of their bad, wrongdoing habits and let the deserving Guyanese people breathe some fresh air for once. Give fairness a chance. Or is that too much to ask for? Do you really want to go down this road? Does Fip etc. ring a bell. You barefaced scamps. Originally Posted by Nehru:

I have to agree, GR is SHAMELESS to the point of no return. Guyanese beware of these Snakeoil Salesmen. All they want  to do is ROB the Guyanese people!!!

 

FM
Originally Posted by Gerhard Ramsaroop:
Originally Posted by Conscience:

 

Even if that is the case, wouldn't the public handing over the cheque serve as an incentive for the client to come forward?  Yes?  No?

 

Moreover, the cheque being deposited would earn interest for the client as well, if he takes long to show up.  The Gov't holding on to it only symbolises their badmindedness.

Using your own words "All that you have said here amounts to conjecture".

 

The known facts are:

 

1. The criminal case involving the tortured teen was dismissed after he failed to show up in court on 17 occasions. Ramjattan claimed then to be unaware of his clients' whereabouts

 

2. Yesterday this very Ramjattan was badgering the AG to have the$6M judgement obtained in the civil suit handed over to him

 

Which when examined questions his reasons for making such a request

FM
Originally Posted by Conscience:
Originally Posted by Conscience:

 

 

2. Yesterday this very Ramjattan was badgering the AG to have the$6M judgement obtained in the civil suit handed over to him

 

Which when examined questions his reasons for making such a request

Albert, Ramjattan wants the money to fix up your Monkey Mountain.

Mitwah
Originally Posted by Nehru:

The more I look at this Video the more I get sick in my stomach. Is Ramjattan a Lawyer really?? Is he the Guyana Gambino Head. Is this the man wanted to be President of Guyana??? SHAMELESS Piece of CRAP!!! Is this the bareface thief talking about transparency and accountable??? Give me a friggin break!!!!!

Nehru,

  After looking at that 7.20  minutes of  video,  I sincerely doubt that any sane,  honest and  reasonable  person would  conclude  that  there  was any wrong doing on the  part  of  the Attorney  involved. As such, it is  my reasoned  judgement, that your 'outrage' and  ' sick  in  my stomach'  denunciation  is perhaps on par with   a Lombard street   hooker  denouncing prostitution and extolling the  virtue of  her chastity.

FM
Originally Posted by Mara:
Originally Posted by Nehru:

The more I look at this Video the more I get sick in my stomach. Is Ramjattan a Lawyer really?? Is he the Guyana Gambino Head. Is this the man wanted to be President of Guyana??? SHAMELESS Piece of CRAP!!! Is this the bareface thief talking about transparency and accountable??? Give me a friggin break!!!!!

Nehru,

  After looking at that 7.20  minutes of  video,  I sincerely doubt that any sane,  honest and  reasonable  person would  conclude  that  there  was any wrong doing on the  part  of  the Attorney  involved. As such, it is  my reasoned  judgement, that your 'outrage' and  ' sick  in  my stomach'  denunciation  is perhaps on par with   a Lombard street   hooker  denouncing prostitution and extolling the  virtue of  her chastity.

Uncle Mara, you patkay de man deh 

FM
Originally Posted by Gerhard Ramsaroop:
Originally Posted by Mara:

 Nehru,

  After looking at that 7.20  minutes of  video,  I sincerely doubt that any sane,  honest and  reasonable  person would  conclude  that  there  was any wrong doing on the  part  of  the Attorney  involved. As such, it is  my reasoned  judgement, that your 'outrage' and  ' sick  in  my stomach'  denunciation  is perhaps on par with   a Lombard street   hooker  denouncing prostitution and extolling the  virtue of  her chastity.

Uncle Mara, you patkay de man deh 

Not exactly  a patkay,  but  just a  little hoonch  in de  backside   

FM
Originally Posted by Mara:
Originally Posted by Gerhard Ramsaroop:
Originally Posted by Mara:

 Nehru,

  After looking at that 7.20  minutes of  video,  I sincerely doubt that any sane,  honest and  reasonable  person would  conclude  that  there  was any wrong doing on the  part  of  the Attorney  involved. As such, it is  my reasoned  judgement, that your 'outrage' and  ' sick  in  my stomach'  denunciation  is perhaps on par with   a Lombard street   hooker  denouncing prostitution and extolling the  virtue of  her chastity.

Uncle Mara, you patkay de man deh 

Not exactly  a patkay,  but  just a  little hoonch  in de  backside   

FM
Originally Posted by Mara:
Originally Posted by Nehru:

The more I look at this Video the more I get sick in my stomach. Is Ramjattan a Lawyer really?? Is he the Guyana Gambino Head. Is this the man wanted to be President of Guyana??? SHAMELESS Piece of CRAP!!! Is this the bareface thief talking about transparency and accountable??? Give me a friggin break!!!!!

Nehru,

  After looking at that 7.20  minutes of  video,  I sincerely doubt that any sane,  honest and  reasonable  person would  conclude  that  there  was any wrong doing on the  part  of  the Attorney  involved. As such, it is  my reasoned  judgement, that your 'outrage' and  ' sick  in  my stomach'  denunciation  is perhaps on par with   a Lombard street   hooker  denouncing prostitution and extolling the  virtue of  her chastity.

Ouch Banana dancingseventh circle's Avatar

Mars
Originally Posted by Conscience:

Its clear to see,Gerhard is solely on this board to do damage control for his politically gathering, he and his whole cabal should be ashamed of themselves, preying on the vulnerable in society...

Listen Kwame prostitute, why don't you and the so-called victims take Ramjattan to the bar to be disciplined?

 


 

Mitwah

Badlu here you go again with your empty skull,this case started 08/2004 and is still not resolve because the original owners are overseas for over 20 years.They humming to the tune of people who do not know the facts,1/3 of the funds they recieved because of their Atty.K.R work is probably finish.Badlu according to the video you claim you are viewing over and over,the chap look like he need a shot real bad.

FM
Originally Posted by Nehru:

Marsa and the entire KFC are who they are"THIEVES, SCUMBAGS, LIARS, POLITICAL PROSTITUTES and SNAKEOIL SALESMEN and THE GUYANESE People are aware of this.

 Nehru Bhai,

 

 With just a cursory glance, one  could  find all of  those and then  some within  the current  cabal infesting  Freedom House. Fortunately, more and more folks are waking up to the reality that a once noble organization has slowly been eroded and surreptitiously hijacked by a band of greedy, corrupt and self serving scoundrels who are totally devoid of moral  & ethical fibre.


In the just concluded Elections , they mockingly shout that “Dem Ah Watch Me” Well,  people were indeed  watching and a significant number didn't  like  what they were seeing. That's why for the first in history, the electorate deprived them of an absolute majority. Now, if there is a smidgen of decency and an iota of honesty still reside in their shriveled  body  politics  and collective  conscience, rather than hurling invectives and   looking  for  scape goat among  the  growing number of  critics, they should engage in some critical self examination & introspection, and change tack before it is too late.


The  '28  Years Shield'  is  getting a bit battered  & worn,  the daily  rehash by  GINA clowns are getting  stale, and I honestly doubt that anyone is  taking  the  verbiage of the 'Poke  Cuttas & Hennessey'  Pandit seriously. 

FM
Originally Posted by Conscience:

Its amazing to think, the very person who claims to be representing the poor and vulnerable.....is not alleged to exploit the very people he calms to represent.....

 You are  so darned  right he  is  not! Now get  back  to  work and tell that  to Kwame and  the  rest  of the  GINA crew!

FM
Originally Posted by Gerhard Ramsaroop:
Originally Posted by Conscience:

 

All that you have said here amounts to conjecture, which you yourself have made clear by the use of words such as "apparently" and "could it be", all framed as questions.  Nothing you have said negates the fact that it is the lawyer who is paid.  That Ramjattan is enquiring into the payment simply means he is doing his job on behalf of his client.

This is a very good attempt at dodging pertinent questions Gerhard. And what job is Ramjattan doing on behalf of which client? Ramjattan is on record as claiming that he did not know the whereabouts of his 'client' Ger..

Even if that is the case, wouldn't the public handing over the cheque serve as an incentive for the client to come forward?  Yes?  No?

 

Moreover, the cheque being deposited would earn interest for the client as well, if he takes long to show up.  The Gov't holding on to it only symbolises their badmindedness.

Ramjattan presents torture victim to AG - in bid for payment of award

Attorney Khemraj Ramjattan yesterday presented the teen boy who was tortured while he was in police custody to Attorney General Anil Nandlall, in a bid to get the government to pay out damages that were awarded by the High Court.

 

Nandlall on Tuesday accused Ramjattan of badgering him for the $6.5M in damages, and said that he had information that the boy’s whereabouts were unknown. Government appealed the award and Nandlall said he indicated that government may settle the matter if Ramjattan produced his client, who could not be located for over a year to testify in court.

 

However, Ramjattan said in an interview with Capitol News yesterday that he visited the Attorney General’s Chambers to get an update on the payment to clear up some comments made by Nandlall questioning his representation of the tortured teen. â€œ[My clients] are here with me to go and make our presence felt at the Attorney General’s Chambers for purposes of vindicating to him that they are still my clients,” he said. He refuted Nandlall’s contentions and indicated that his client wanted their money, which he has been authorised to receive.

 

According to Nandlall, Ramjattan had requested the award be paid to him but he maintained that it was the clients that were entitled to the sum and not his attorney. He added that now that the clients have been produced, the government is to decide whether it will be pursuing the appeal or settling the matter.

 

Nandlall said as an attorney, he knows that lawyers have the authority to receive money on behalf of their clients but as Attorney General and the state’s attorney in the case, he has to ensure that the actual client is being paid. He stressed that Ramjattan indicated that his fees are in the judgment sum so he (Nandlall) has to be satisfied that the client receives the judgment sum.

 

“Ramjattan told me that to pay him the judgment’s sum because his fees are in there, but I don’t care about that, I have to ensure that ultimately the client is the one being paid,” he said. The teen, through Ramjattan, had filed a lawsuit against the Attorney General, the Commissioner of Police and the two ranks accused of torturing him, asking for $40 million in compensation.

 

Last June, Justice George after describing the case as constituting torture, awarded the teenager $6.5 million in damages. In giving her ruling she explained that there had been a violation of his fundamental human rights. 

 

The boy had been held for questioning in connection with the murder of retired Region Three vice-chairman Ramenaught Bisram, who was found dead at his home on Monday October 26, 2009 with several stab wounds. While being interrogated by police officers at the Leonora Police Station, the boy, then 15, was reportedly doused with methylated spirits and set alight.

 

Two policemen, Mohanram Dolai and Narine Lall, were later charged for causing grievous bodily harm to the then 15-year old teen but had the charges later dismissed in the Magistrate’s Court, when the teen and his family failed to show up at the trial to give evidence.

FM

While  these  pukes are  dickering over a  paltry   6.5  million  dollar  court  awarded  judgement  to a kid  who was  severely tortured by  agents  of the  States,  they are  feverishly  trying  to  sweep  a  90  million  dollar caper  and  other glaring boondoggle ( Ministry  of  Education Book  Scam,  contracts  etc.) under  the  rug.  And  they  are  wondering  why  more and  more  of  their traditional  base  are  deserting  them!

 

If  Donald  Ramotar  has  any balls and  brain,  he would  recognize the urgency to  change tack and  start  being  his  own  man. Stop looking  for traitors  and  neemakharams in the  AFC!  They are  all within  your  bosom. 

FM

According to Nandlall, Ramjattan had requested the award be paid to him but he maintained that it was the clients that were entitled to the sum and not his attorney. He added that now that the clients have been produced, the government is to decide whether it will be pursuing the appeal or settling the matter.

Nandlall said as an attorney, he knows that lawyers have the authority to receive money on behalf of their clients but as Attorney General and the state’s attorney in the case, he has to ensure that the actual client is being paid. He stressed that Ramjattan indicated that his fees are in the judgment sum so he (Nandlall) has to be satisfied that the client receives the judgment sum.

“Ramjattan told me that to pay him the judgment’s sum because his fees are in there, but I don’t care about that, I have to ensure that ultimately the client is the one being paid,” he said.

 

Excerpts from Stabroeknews

FM

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×