Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

While you're waiting for an answer, Ayatollah, look at this pic. Nothing better than cooling down with kids under a coconut tree. The best things in life are free. You don't need hundreds of thousands US moolah for a little peace. I wish I were in Granger's place here.

[Sorry for this diversion, sir. Me nah derail yuh thread. Me only want a space fo park dis pickcha. ]

FM
Originally Posted by Jalil:

Shaitaan....Balwant Claim he got Copies of the records to prove everything.

 

Why GINA, NCN, Chronicle & Guyana Times do not believe his story?

It will only take them three former AFC members to fix allyou once and for all. PPP don't have to do nothing. Don't worry who believe them, they were talking directly to the Berbice people.

FM
Last edited by Former Member
Originally Posted by Jalil:

Shaitaan....Balwant Claim he got Copies of the records to prove everything.

 

Why GINA, NCN, Chronicle & Guyana Times do not believe his story?

 

I don't claim to know anything about what Balwant, Yusuf, or Sextus has to say. Therefore, I am unable to comment and do not wish to.

 

However, I will comment based on my intimate knowledge of Cathy Hughes' financial misbehavior using the AFC as her personal piggybank. It may not be technically illegal to get paid huge sums by your own party's campaign but it betrays no ethics whatsoever as most of those monies are raised from well intentioned middle class businessmen (not the super rich) and ordinary working and middle class individuals.

 

One of the reasons cited by many "foreign" places for not helping the AFC is their desire to not make hefty donations to Cathy Hughes' bank account.

FM
Originally Posted by Cobra:

Our president is around children all the time, not just around election time. Uncle Donald is like a loving granddad. kutchie-kutchie

Is Ramotar still getting Jagdeo to slap AmerIndians, because dem too stupid ?

How many photos Ramotar  got of AmerIndians when its not an election?  

Tola
Last edited by Tola
Originally Posted by Shaitaan:
Originally Posted by Jalil:

Shaitaan....Balwant Claim he got Copies of the records to prove everything.

 

Why GINA, NCN, Chronicle & Guyana Times do not believe his story?

 

 

I don't claim to know anything about what Balwant, Yusuf, or Sextus has to say. Therefore, I am unable to comment and do not wish to.

 

However, I will comment based on my intimate knowledge of Cathy Hughes' financial misbehavior using the AFC as her personal piggybank.

 

It may not be technically illegal to get paid huge sums by your own party's campaign but it betrays no ethics whatsoever as most of those monies are raised from well intentioned middle class businessmen (not the super rich) and ordinary working and middle class individuals.

 

One of the reasons cited by many "foreign" places for not helping the AFC is their desire to not make hefty donations to Cathy Hughes' bank account.

Shaitan

if your intimate knowledge

has any truth to it,

why are you refusing to expose them....

 

 

And you claim your truth 

is based on One of the reasons

cited by many "foreign" places.

 

This is beginning to sound like a next 

"$500.Fortnightly pay Check - Federal Agent"

Who you say does Engineer Facts....

 

Isn't That's a Federal Crime

if that is going on.

Check with CaribJ

FM
Last edited by Former Member
Originally Posted by Jalil:
Originally Posted by Shaitaan:
Originally Posted by Jalil:

Shaitaan....Balwant Claim he got Copies of the records to prove everything.

 

Why GINA, NCN, Chronicle & Guyana Times do not believe his story?

 

 

I don't claim to know anything about what Balwant, Yusuf, or Sextus has to say. Therefore, I am unable to comment and do not wish to.

 

However, I will comment based on my intimate knowledge of Cathy Hughes' financial misbehavior using the AFC as her personal piggybank.

 

It may not be technically illegal to get paid huge sums by your own party's campaign but it betrays no ethics whatsoever as most of those monies are raised from well intentioned middle class businessmen (not the super rich) and ordinary working and middle class individuals.

 

One of the reasons cited by many "foreign" places for not helping the AFC is their desire to not make hefty donations to Cathy Hughes' bank account.

Shaitan

if your intimate knowledge

has any truth to it,

why are you refusing to expose them....

 

 

And you claim your truth 

is based on One of the reasons

cited by many "foreign" places.

 

This is beginning to sound like a next 

"$500.Fortnightly pay Check - Federal Agent"

Who you say does Engineer Facts....

 

Isn't That's a Federal Crime

if that is going on.

Check with CaribJ

 

I'd be careful, with the sole exception of Nagamootoo, in the AFC, NONE are immune from instances of provable corruption.

 

However, Cathy Hughes stands out as the worst offender and should be pushed out. I say Cathy Hughes because I take great pains to not guilt by association her husband Nigel.

FM
Originally Posted by Shaitaan:

No time like the present to chat about this.

 

Wrong is wrong. Which is why I have next to zero confidence in the AFC being just another round of thieves-in-waiting.

"Hundreds of Thousands . . ."?? wow!

 

the AFC have that kind of $US to throw at Kathy Hughes for PR work?

 

i say u are an idle little man, and u LIE like a skunk!

FM
Last edited by Former Member
Originally Posted by Cobra:

Our president is around children all the time, not just around election time. Uncle Donald is like a loving granddad. kutchie-kutchie

You miss the point.  The notion is Granger in close quarters with an Indian female and child and no bands of irate Indian men threatening to chop him up.

 

The PNC is proving to be less of the bogey man than the PPP will want to believe.  Will he get Indian votes?  No!  Will every Indian react to him in fear as they decide which party they will support? NO!

 

The AFC will need to prove itself, and stop being insulted when people tell them that this is what they must do, and if they do so, the PPP is OVER!

FM
Originally Posted by redux:
Originally Posted by Shaitaan:

No time like the present to chat about this.

 

Wrong is wrong. Which is why I have next to zero confidence in the AFC being just another round of thieves-in-waiting.

"Hundreds of Thousands . . ."?? wow!

 

the AFC have that kind of $US to throw at Kathy Hughes for PR work?

 

i say u are an idle little man, and u LIE like a skunk!

Redux one day you will gain the intelligence to understand that in politics it isn't what is true that is important.  It is what people BELIEVE to be true.

 

The PPP is playing a smart game.  They know that if disgruntled PPP supporters PERCEIVE the AFC as corrupt then they will stay with the corrupt party which they know.  The # 1 reason that people cite for dumping the PPP is corruption, and so if APNU AFC are also tainted with this brush then that means that the PPP keeps its support base.

 

The AFC is so often too little too late.  If there is no truth in the accusations of internal party corruption, or if they can prove that former AFC officials who make these accusations are themselves being corrupt (PPP soup drinking) then they ought to discuss this.

FM
Last edited by Former Member
Originally Posted by caribny:
Originally Posted by redux:
Originally Posted by Shaitaan:

No time like the present to chat about this.

 

Wrong is wrong. Which is why I have next to zero confidence in the AFC being just another round of thieves-in-waiting.

"Hundreds of Thousands . . ."?? wow!

 

the AFC have that kind of $US to throw at Kathy Hughes for PR work?

 

i say u are an idle little man, and u LIE like a skunk!

Redux one day you will gain the intelligence to understand that in politics it isn't what is true that is important.  It is what people BELIEVE to be true.

 

The PPP is playing a smart game.  They know that if disgruntled PPP supporters PERCEIVE the AFC as corrupt then they will stay with the corrupt party which they know.  The # 1 reason that people cite for dumping the PPP is corruption, and so if APNU AFC are also tainted with this brush then that means that the PPP keeps its support base.

 

The AFC is so often too little too late.  If there is no truth in the accusations of internal party corruption, or if they can prove that former AFC officials who make these accusations are themselves being corrupt (PPP soup drinking) then they ought to discuss this.

 

Redux's defense of the AFC seems to be that Cathy Hughes stole a lessor amount than what is being alleged

FM
Originally Posted by Shaitaan:
Originally Posted by caribny:
Originally Posted by redux:
Originally Posted by Shaitaan:

No time like the present to chat about this.

 

Wrong is wrong. Which is why I have next to zero confidence in the AFC being just another round of thieves-in-waiting.

"Hundreds of Thousands . . ."?? wow!

 

the AFC have that kind of $US to throw at Kathy Hughes for PR work?

 

i say u are an idle little man, and u LIE like a skunk!

Redux one day you will gain the intelligence to understand that in politics it isn't what is true that is important.  It is what people BELIEVE to be true.

 

The PPP is playing a smart game.  They know that if disgruntled PPP supporters PERCEIVE the AFC as corrupt then they will stay with the corrupt party which they know.  The # 1 reason that people cite for dumping the PPP is corruption, and so if APNU AFC are also tainted with this brush then that means that the PPP keeps its support base.

 

The AFC is so often too little too late.  If there is no truth in the accusations of internal party corruption, or if they can prove that former AFC officials who make these accusations are themselves being corrupt (PPP soup drinking) then they ought to discuss this.

 

Redux's defense of the AFC seems to be that Cathy Hughes stole a lessor amount than what is being alleged

Until you can show some proof of your allegations, it's just cheap rum shop gossip.

Mars
Originally Posted by Mars:
Originally Posted by Shaitaan:
Originally Posted by caribny:
Originally Posted by redux:
Originally Posted by Shaitaan:

No time like the present to chat about this.

 

Wrong is wrong. Which is why I have next to zero confidence in the AFC being just another round of thieves-in-waiting.

"Hundreds of Thousands . . ."?? wow!

 

the AFC have that kind of $US to throw at Kathy Hughes for PR work?

 

i say u are an idle little man, and u LIE like a skunk!

Redux one day you will gain the intelligence to understand that in politics it isn't what is true that is important.  It is what people BELIEVE to be true.

 

The PPP is playing a smart game.  They know that if disgruntled PPP supporters PERCEIVE the AFC as corrupt then they will stay with the corrupt party which they know.  The # 1 reason that people cite for dumping the PPP is corruption, and so if APNU AFC are also tainted with this brush then that means that the PPP keeps its support base.

 

The AFC is so often too little too late.  If there is no truth in the accusations of internal party corruption, or if they can prove that former AFC officials who make these accusations are themselves being corrupt (PPP soup drinking) then they ought to discuss this.

 

Redux's defense of the AFC seems to be that Cathy Hughes stole a lessor amount than what is being alleged

Until you can show some proof of your allegations, it's just cheap rum shop gossip.

 

Well then them foreign embassies in GT must be reporting "cheap rum shop gossip" back to their home capitals.

FM
Originally Posted by Shaitaan:
 

Redux's defense of the AFC seems to be that Cathy Hughes stole a lessor amount than what is being alleged

Redux is an angry ideologue.  So he gets stuck in the mud.  So you make a joke about Cathy stealing "hundreds of thousands", he fixates on that.

 

What he doesn't seem to understand is that the PPP, and maybe you, are deliberately tarnishing the AFC as also being corrupt.

 

So if PPP=corrupt=AFC, they trick is to tell its supporters that electing the AFC will not end corruption, so they might as well continue to support the PPP.

 

Redux needs to focus on the fact that most Guyanese still don't really trust the AFC's ability to win votes, and so are often reluctant to listen to them, so it is up to the AFC to prove themselves. 

FM
Originally Posted by Shaitaan:
Originally Posted by caribny:
Originally Posted by redux:
Originally Posted by Shaitaan:

No time like the present to chat about this.

 

Wrong is wrong. Which is why I have next to zero confidence in the AFC being just another round of thieves-in-waiting.

"Hundreds of Thousands . . ."?? wow!

 

the AFC have that kind of $US to throw at Kathy Hughes for PR work?

 

i say u are an idle little man, and u LIE like a skunk!

Redux one day you will gain the intelligence to understand that in politics it isn't what is true that is important.  It is what people BELIEVE to be true.

 

The PPP is playing a smart game.  They know that if disgruntled PPP supporters PERCEIVE the AFC as corrupt then they will stay with the corrupt party which they know.  The # 1 reason that people cite for dumping the PPP is corruption, and so if APNU AFC are also tainted with this brush then that means that the PPP keeps its support base.

 

The AFC is so often too little too late.  If there is no truth in the accusations of internal party corruption, or if they can prove that former AFC officials who make these accusations are themselves being corrupt (PPP soup drinking) then they ought to discuss this.

 

Redux's defense of the AFC seems to be that Cathy Hughes stole a lessor amount than what is being alleged

A thief is a thief, in the court of law , does the amount matter? only for the penalty.

K
Originally Posted by Mars:
Or

Until you can show some proof of your allegations, it's just cheap rum shop gossip.

People on GNI think that they are so important.  Its not up to Shaitaan to prove anything as he is merely repeating those accusations, and embellishing them.

 

It is up to the AFC to show proof that allegations of internal party corruption are lies, and that those who make them are PPP soup drinkers.

 

Because the PPP doesn't care whether these accusations are true or not.  They want to highlight to Guyanese, that the AFC is no less corrupt than is the PPP.  Silence on the part of the AFC then suggests that they are unable to discredit these reports.

 

No party can afford to have bad news sink in without responding to it, and definitely NOT the AFC, which already made a risky move by joining with the PNC.

FM
Originally Posted by caribny:
Originally Posted by Shaitaan:
 

Redux's defense of the AFC seems to be that Cathy Hughes stole a lessor amount than what is being alleged

Redux is an angry ideologue.  So he gets stuck in the mud.  So you make a joke about Cathy stealing "hundreds of thousands", he fixates on that.

 

What he doesn't seem to understand is that the PPP, and maybe you, are deliberately tarnishing the AFC as also being corrupt.

 

So if PPP=corrupt=AFC, they trick is to tell its supporters that electing the AFC will not end corruption, so they might as well continue to support the PPP.

 

Redux needs to focus on the fact that most Guyanese still don't really trust the AFC's ability to win votes, and so are often reluctant to listen to them, so it is up to the AFC to prove themselves. 

 

I'm not tarnishing the AFC. I'm tarnishing Cathy Hughes because she deserves to be tarnished.

 

I've known about this for years and have kept quiet. Now I know the PPP knows about Cathy Hughes so no point in being quiet anymore.

 

There is another AFC Big One who also has a grubby hand that I will remain silent about because the PPP doan know about those runnings and I'm not gonna spill the beans. (You're welcome AFC goons.)

 

The AFC lucky people like me don't tek buyout.

FM
Originally Posted by caribny:
Originally Posted by Mars:
Or

Until you can show some proof of your allegations, it's just cheap rum shop gossip.

People on GNI think that they are so important.  Its not up to Shaitaan to prove anything as he is merely repeating those accusations, and embellishing them.

 

It is up to the AFC to show proof that allegations of internal party corruption are lies, and that those who make them are PPP soup drinkers.

 

Because the PPP doesn't care whether these accusations are true or not.  They want to highlight to Guyanese, that the AFC is no less corrupt than is the PPP.  Silence on the part of the AFC then suggests that they are unable to discredit these reports.

 

No party can afford to have bad news sink in without responding to it, and definitely NOT the AFC, which already made a risky move by joining with the PNC.

If you make an allegation, you should have proof or you're just being a scandalous big man repeating gossip. 

 

If I were Cathy Hughes, how do I go about providing proof that I accepted money which was not earned? Sounds a bit like providing proof that unicorns do not exist. If the woman is doing PR work, she ought to be paid for it as a professional. In the same manner that Moses was paid by NICIL for providing legal services to citizens who were relocated by the Berbice Bridge.  

Mars
Last edited by Mars
Originally Posted by Shaitaan:
I'm not tarnishing the AFC. I'm tarnishing Cathy Hughes because she deserves to be tarnished.

 

I've known about this for years and have kept quiet. Now I know the PPP knows about Cathy Hughes so no point in being quiet anymore.

 

There is another AFC Big One who also has a grubby hand that I will remain silent about because the PPP doan know about those runnings and I'm not gonna spill the beans. (You're welcome AFC goons.)

 

The AFC lucky people like me don't tek buyout.

you are a small time fraud and a LIAR!

 

that shyte about secret knowledge is an old baseman staple and familiar refuge of 'business people' plying their trade with no underwear

FM
Originally Posted by redux:
Originally Posted by Shaitaan:
Redux's defense of the AFC seems to be that Cathy Hughes stole a lessor amount than what is being alleged

i defend nothing . . . but u knew that already, rite?

 

i simply nail your LIES to the wall for all to see!

 

that's all

Redux you are like a mad bull stuck in the mad, thrashing and stamping and looking angrily at every one around you.

 

Get it straight.  The PPP is trying to muddy the waters by making a huge issue over what might be some petty corruption or conflict of interest or most likely sloppy book keeping.  They do so to tell Guyanese that "you all think that we are corrupt, but then so is the AFC".  This because the number ONE reason why they might lose is if people think that the PPP is more corrupt than the APNU AFC coalition is perceived to be.

 

Focus on that fact and stop stomping your foot like a mad bull stuck in mud.

FM
Originally Posted by redux:
Originally Posted by Shaitaan:
I'm not tarnishing the AFC. I'm tarnishing Cathy Hughes because she deserves to be tarnished.

 

I've known about this for years and have kept quiet. Now I know the PPP knows about Cathy Hughes so no point in being quiet anymore.

 

There is another AFC Big One who also has a grubby hand that I will remain silent about because the PPP doan know about those runnings and I'm not gonna spill the beans. (You're welcome AFC goons.)

 

The AFC lucky people like me don't tek buyout.

you are a small time fraud and a LIAR!

 

And so what if he is. Shaitaan isn't the one making the allegation.

 

THREE former AFC officials are.  THREE people who might be seen as being credible in their accusations unless the AFC deals with it.

 

Now has the AFC dealt with it, or as usual, are they floating around thinking that they are angels who aren't obligated to defend their image?

 

THAT is what you need to be focused on!

FM
Originally Posted by Mars:
 

If you make an allegation, you should have proof or you're just being a scandalous big man repeating gossip. 

 

If I were Cathy Hughes, how do I go about providing proof that I accepted money which was not earned? Sounds a bit like providing proof that unicorns do not exist. If the woman is doing PR work, she ought to be paid for it as a professional. In the same manner that Moses was paid by NICIL for providing legal services to citizens who were relocated by the Berbice Bridge.  

NO PPP official has been made to defend accusations of corruption, and yet the perception exists of the PPP being corrupt.

 

So people don't need to have proof to believe that some one is corrupt.

 

The PPP is no longer trying to claim not to be corrupt.  What they want to do is to cater to the notion that the ENTIRE political system is corrupt, including the AFC.

 

MOTIVE.  To get disgusted people to stay home, rather than voting for APNU AFC.

 

I assume that you are a little child because you surely think like one!

 

 

FORMER AFC OFFICIALS made certain accusations.  The AFC has to DEFEND themselves against such!  How difficult can that be?

FM
Last edited by Former Member
Originally Posted by caribny:
Originally Posted by redux:
Originally Posted by Shaitaan:
I'm not tarnishing the AFC. I'm tarnishing Cathy Hughes because she deserves to be tarnished.

 

I've known about this for years and have kept quiet. Now I know the PPP knows about Cathy Hughes so no point in being quiet anymore.

 

There is another AFC Big One who also has a grubby hand that I will remain silent about because the PPP doan know about those runnings and I'm not gonna spill the beans. (You're welcome AFC goons.)

 

The AFC lucky people like me don't tek buyout.

you are a small time fraud and a LIAR!

 

And so what if he is. Shaitaan isn't the one making the allegation.

 

THREE former AFC officials are.  THREE people who might be seen as being credible in their accusations unless the AFC deals with it.

 

Now has the AFC dealt with it, or as usual, are they floating around thinking that they are angels who aren't obligated to defend their image?

 

THAT is what you need to be focused on!

 

What should be even more worrisome is that they're making these allegations quite publicly with full knowledge of the strict provisions of the Defamation Act.

FM
Originally Posted by Shaitaan:
Originally Posted by caribny:
Originally Posted by Shaitaan:
 

Redux's defense of the AFC seems to be that Cathy Hughes stole a lessor amount than what is being alleged

Redux is an angry ideologue.  So he gets stuck in the mud.  So you make a joke about Cathy stealing "hundreds of thousands", he fixates on that.

 

What he doesn't seem to understand is that the PPP, and maybe you, are deliberately tarnishing the AFC as also being corrupt.

 

So if PPP=corrupt=AFC, they trick is to tell its supporters that electing the AFC will not end corruption, so they might as well continue to support the PPP.

 

Redux needs to focus on the fact that most Guyanese still don't really trust the AFC's ability to win votes, and so are often reluctant to listen to them, so it is up to the AFC to prove themselves. 

 

I'm not tarnishing the AFC. I'm tarnishing Cathy Hughes because she deserves to be tarnished.

 

I've known about this for years and have kept quiet. Now I know the PPP knows about Cathy Hughes so no point in being quiet anymore.

 

There is another AFC Big One who also has a grubby hand that I will remain silent about because the PPP doan know about those runnings and I'm not gonna spill the beans. (You're welcome AFC goons.)

 

The AFC lucky people like me don't tek buyout.

YOU LOSING YOUR MARBLES OLD CHAP 

FM
Originally Posted by caribny:
Originally Posted by Mars:
 

If you make an allegation, you should have proof or you're just being a scandalous big man repeating gossip. 

 

If I were Cathy Hughes, how do I go about providing proof that I accepted money which was not earned? Sounds a bit like providing proof that unicorns do not exist. If the woman is doing PR work, she ought to be paid for it as a professional. In the same manner that Moses was paid by NICIL for providing legal services to citizens who were relocated by the Berbice Bridge.  

NO PPP official has been made to defend accusations of corruption, and yet the perception exists of the PPP being corrupt.

 

So people don't need to have proof to believe that some one is corrupt.

 

The PPP is no longer trying to claim not to be corrupt.  What they want to do is to cater to the notion that the ENTIRE political system is corrupt, including the AFC.

 

MOTIVE.  To get disgusted people to stay home, rather than voting for APNU AFC.

 

I assume that you are a little child because you surely think like one!

 

 

FORMER AFC OFFICIALS made certain accusations.  The AFC has to DEFEND themselves against such!  How difficult can that be?

You talking sheer piss and I answered you. You are saying that the onus is on Cathy Hughes to provide proof that she received money that she did not earn. Tell me how Cathy Hughes is going to do that Einstein. 

Mars
Originally Posted by caribny:
Originally Posted by redux:
Originally Posted by Shaitaan:
I'm not tarnishing the AFC. I'm tarnishing Cathy Hughes because she deserves to be tarnished.

 

I've known about this for years and have kept quiet. Now I know the PPP knows about Cathy Hughes so no point in being quiet anymore.

 

There is another AFC Big One who also has a grubby hand that I will remain silent about because the PPP doan know about those runnings and I'm not gonna spill the beans. (You're welcome AFC goons.)

 

The AFC lucky people like me don't tek buyout.

you are a small time fraud and a LIAR!

 

Shaitaan isn't the one making the allegation . . .

actually, he is

 

pay attention now

FM
Originally Posted by Mars:
Originally Posted by caribny:
Originally Posted by Mars:
 

If you make an allegation, you should have proof or you're just being a scandalous big man repeating gossip. 

 

If I were Cathy Hughes, how do I go about providing proof that I accepted money which was not earned? Sounds a bit like providing proof that unicorns do not exist. If the woman is doing PR work, she ought to be paid for it as a professional. In the same manner that Moses was paid by NICIL for providing legal services to citizens who were relocated by the Berbice Bridge.  

NO PPP official has been made to defend accusations of corruption, and yet the perception exists of the PPP being corrupt.

 

So people don't need to have proof to believe that some one is corrupt.

 

The PPP is no longer trying to claim not to be corrupt.  What they want to do is to cater to the notion that the ENTIRE political system is corrupt, including the AFC.

 

MOTIVE.  To get disgusted people to stay home, rather than voting for APNU AFC.

 

I assume that you are a little child because you surely think like one!

 

 

FORMER AFC OFFICIALS made certain accusations.  The AFC has to DEFEND themselves against such!  How difficult can that be?

You talking sheer piss and I answered you. You are saying that the onus is on Cathy Hughes to provide proof that she received money that she did not earn. Tell me how Cathy Hughes is going to do that Einstein. 

 

They can publicize their payments to Cathy Hughes and explain them. That would be a good start.

FM
Originally Posted by Shaitaan:
They can publicize their payments to Cathy Hughes and explain them. That would be a good start.

and where would be a good end for y'all, eh smartman

 

this is an interesting process . . . accuse someone of misappropriating "Hundreds of Thousands" without A SHRED OF PROOF, then demanding that they provide 'evidence' of their innocence

 

seriously? . . . this would not be clever even in high school

FM
Last edited by Former Member
Originally Posted by redux:
Originally Posted by Shaitaan:
They can publicize their payments to Cathy Hughes and explain them. That would be a good start.

and where would be a good end for y'all, eh smartman

 

this is an interesting process . . . accuse someone of misappropriating "Hundreds of Thousands" without A SHRED OF PROOF, then demanding that they provide 'evidence' of their innocence

 

seriously . . .?

the AFC had that much money is Guyanese this stupid 

FM
Originally Posted by redux:
Originally Posted by Shaitaan:
They can publicize their payments to Cathy Hughes and explain them. That would be a good start.

and where would be a good end for y'all, eh smartman

 

this is an interesting process . . . accuse someone of misappropriating "Hundreds of Thousands" without A SHRED OF PROOF, then demanding that they provide 'evidence' of their innocence

 

seriously . . .?

 

I believe that is how it works in politics.

FM
Originally Posted by Shaitaan:
Originally Posted by redux:
Originally Posted by Shaitaan:
They can publicize their payments to Cathy Hughes and explain them. That would be a good start.

and where would be a good end for y'all, eh smartman

 

this is an interesting process . . . accuse someone of misappropriating "Hundreds of Thousands" without A SHRED OF PROOF, then demanding that they provide 'evidence' of their innocence

 

seriously . . .?

 

I believe that is how it works in politics.

get real brother,can you steal something that is not there

FM
Originally Posted by warrior:
Originally Posted by Shaitaan:
Originally Posted by redux:
Originally Posted by Shaitaan:
They can publicize their payments to Cathy Hughes and explain them. That would be a good start.

and where would be a good end for y'all, eh smartman

 

this is an interesting process . . . accuse someone of misappropriating "Hundreds of Thousands" without A SHRED OF PROOF, then demanding that they provide 'evidence' of their innocence

 

seriously . . .?

 

I believe that is how it works in politics.

get real brother,can you steal something that is not there

 

The AFC actually raised hundreds of thousands of USDs in each of the past two election cycles.

FM
Originally Posted by Shaitaan:
Originally Posted by redux:
Originally Posted by Shaitaan:
They can publicize their payments to Cathy Hughes and explain them. That would be a good start.

and where would be a good end for y'all, eh smartman

 

this is an interesting process . . . accuse someone of misappropriating "Hundreds of Thousands" without A SHRED OF PROOF, then demanding that they provide 'evidence' of their innocence

 

seriously? . . . this would not be clever even in high school

 I believe that is how it works in politics.

you need to get out more and stop hanging out with kwame's Region 11 protÃĐgÃĐs

FM
Originally Posted by caribny:
Originally Posted by Cobra:

Our president is around children all the time, not just around election time. Uncle Donald is like a loving granddad. kutchie-kutchie

You miss the point.  The notion is Granger in close quarters with an Indian female and child and no bands of irate Indian men threatening to chop him up.

 

The PNC is proving to be less of the bogey man than the PPP will want to believe. 

Will he get Indian votes?  No! 

Will every Indian react to him in fear as they decide which party they will support? NO!

 

The AFC will need to prove itself, and stop being insulted when people tell them that this is what they must do, and if they do so, the PPP is OVER!

Aya ignore CaribJ he is a

Black Racist talking Nuff $kunt.

 

Let us Examine the $kunt carefully......

CaribJ .....

AFC + APNU entered into an Alliance...

 Da penetrate yuh thick Skull yet

 

The Presidential Candidate...

is Granger

The Prime Ministerial Candidate ...

is Nagamootoo

Da penetrate yuh thick Skull yet

 

Everyone Voting for the

AFC/APNU Alliance...

 

Will be Voting for Both

 Granger and Nagamootoo

 

Da penetrate yuh thick Skull yet

 

 

 

Everyone Voting for the

AFC/APNU Alliance...

 

Will be Voting for Both

 A Blackman & A Coolieman

 

Da penetrate yuh thick Skull yet

 

 

 

CaribJ...Why is that Hard

for A Racist to Understant.

 

How you think

Or maybe he's saying,

Any lil child can tell you

Both Indians & Blacks

 will vote for Both Granger & Moses

SO HAUL YUH RACIST RASS

 

 

FM

Funny that his man is now making accusations of fraud and all the time he was quiet.

 

Canadian visa scamâ€ĶMore victims surface

JANUARY 25, 2009 | BY  | FILED UNDER NEWS 
“I gat a contact in the High Commissioner Office in Trinidad” â€“ Con man tells them

As news of a big Canadian visa racket spreads, more Guyanese have come forward to disclose how they were fleeced of thousands of Canadian dollars by an Immigration Consultant and his local accomplice.

Yesterday, five more persons reported that they had paid over various sums of money amounting to more than CDN$25,000 to Immigration Consultant Balwant Persaud and his associate, Alim Samad, for them to secure Canadian Student Visas.

However, after several months, they are still waiting on the visas, and calls to the local associate for a refund of their monies are unsuccessful.

They now intend to involve the police in the matter.

One of the victims, who hails from the island of Wakenaam, told this newspaper that he learnt about the offer after seeing an advertisement in the local newspapers.

He then contacted Balwant Persaud at his office in Georgetown, and was advised of the details of the agreement that included the fee of CDN$12,000.

The victim said that his mother, who resides in North America, eventually paid over CDN$6,000 to Persaud in Canada as an advance.

He also handed over his passport, and was told to await instructions on when to go for a medical examination.

Two weeks later, Persaud contacted him and invited him and several other persons to his office in Georgetown, claiming that a problem had developed.

At the office, the victim and several other persons were introduced to Alim Samad, whom Persaud claimed was his associate who will be taking over the arrangements.

They were made to sign a document relieving Persaud of all the responsibilities of obtaining the visas for them. Samad was now in charge, since Persaud was returning to Canada.

Subsequently, a document confirming acceptance to the Humber Institute of Technology and Advanced Learning was handed over to the victim, and obviously he was convinced that the transaction was genuine.

What he did not know was that the document could have been obtained on the Internet.

The next step was to obtain the medical.

However, according to the victim, Samad insisted that he had a special doctor to look after it, although the victim had his own family doctor.

The victim was told that, should the stipulated time for obtaining the medical expire, the advanced CDN$6,000 would be forfeited.

Things got worse when the stipulated time for the medical to be presented expired, and the victim became suspicious.

“We would normally meet him (Samad) in his car outside of Demico House. From the time we met him, he told us that he does not have an office and he didn’t want anybody coming at his house,” the victim said.

Samad got bolder and demanded the rest of the money in exchange for the return of the victim’s passport.

But after a while, during which things did not materialize, the victim enquired about a refund of his money, which he claimed Samad agreed to.

But, since then, all contact with the alleged con man has been lost. Repeated calls to his cellular phone have been unsuccessful.

Another victim from Essequibo claimed that her uncle in Canada had also paid money to Balwant Persaud in Canada.

She, too, was subsequently introduced to Alim Samad for a continuation of the process.

After several weeks, she went to a city bank where she had earlier been instructed to prepare a bank draft in Canadian dollars to a fictitious agency, and found out that the money had not been uplifted.

She, too, became suspicious and tried contacting Samad for a refund of her money.

She even called Balwant Persaud in Canada, who told her that she should contact Samad, since he (Persaud) was no longer dealing with the matter.

Persaud also advised her to seek the services of an attorney.

“I told him that when he collected the money, I did not need a lawyer, so why should I need a lawyer now,” the woman told this newspaper.

She said that the last time she had contact with Alim Samad was in December last year, and he had promised to refund her money this January, but he has not done so.

Another female victim from Black Bush Polder related that she was told by Balwant Persaud that he was in a position to legally get her to Canada, and she fell for it.

Her sister who resides in Canada paid over the advance sum of CDN$6,000 to Persaud in Canada.

She, too, was subsequently introduced to Alim Samad by Persaud, and it was then her troubles started.

She paid over a further G$1.2M to Samad in his car at a location in Mahaica, but things weren’t moving as fast as promised.

“He kept telling me that he has a contact at the Canadian High Commission in Trinidad but he was not presently in office. He said that as soon as his contact was back in office things will move ahead,” the woman said.

Since last year she, too, has been trying to contact Samad to get a refund of her money.

“Somebody has to take away this man’s immigration licence,” the victim said.

A few years ago, the Canadian Government was forced to relocate its consular offices to Trinidad, because of a visa racket involving one of its staff.

It is believed that more than 20 persons have been conned in this current scheme, but many of them are too ashamed to come forward.

This newspaper is willing to assist other victims of the alleged scam, and they are advised to contact telephone numbers 225-8458, 225-8491 or 649-9591.

 

Canada-based Guyanese Immigration Consultant off to jail

FEBRUARY 13, 2009 | BY  | FILED UNDER NEWS 

After claiming he could obtain “Canadian visas” for a number of persons, Immigration Consultant Balwant Persaud, 54, of 57 Robb Street, Bourda, was yesterday slapped with two counts of obtaining money by false pretence and another of fraud.
It was alleged that Persaud on June 11, 2008 obtained $1.2M from Kampaul Jaipaul by falsely pretending that he could secure a Canadian student visa, knowing same to be false.
A second charge states that on August 7, 2008, also with the intent to defraud, he obtained $1M from Nadira Mohan under the same pretext. Another charge states that Persaud, with intent to defraud, on July 5, 2008, informed a number of students that he can obtain Canadian documents for them, knowing that this could not be the case.
Persaud pleaded not guilty to all charges before Acting Chief Magistrate Melissa Robertson.
He was represented by attorney-at-law Glenn Hanoman, who in an unsuccessful bid to secure bail told the court that Persaud is not a “con artist” but a “certified Immigration Consultant”.
Hanoman further told the court that Persaud was released on $50,000 station bail. He also has no pervious convictions.
The lawyer further explained that a man by the name of “Alim Samad” was and is the real culprit. Hanoman said that Samad was arrested, questioned, then released, leaving his client Balwant Persaud to be charged for the present offences.
The lawyer relentlessly argued that “Samad” was the “real con artist” and he went behind Persaud’s back and obtained the money from the virtual complainants.
The lawyer said that his client was overseas when all the money transactions were done.  Police Prosecutor Denise Griffith objected to bail for Persaud.  The prosecutor noted that although Balwant Persaud was a certified consultant, he is not licensed to practise here.
She further told the court that the police never wanted Alim Samad.
This newspaper was informed that Samad who was also named by several victims as being an integral part of the alleged scheme had presented himself to the police on Wednesday but was released.
A source at the Criminal Investigations Department Headquarters, Eve Leary told Kaieteur News that Samad claimed that he had seen reports of the scam while he was in Trinidad and he returned to Guyana to clear his name.
The source also said that investigators had no incriminating evidence against Samad despite victims’ claims that they had paid money to him.
The victims also produced receipts which purportedly confirmed that Samad had collected large sums from them.
The Prosecutor disclosed that other charges were likely to be laid against the defendant shortly.  Balwant Persaud was remanded to prison and is expected to make his next court appearance on Monday.
As he was leaving the court compound Persaud loudly proclaimed that the charges against him were instigated by senior government officials because he had publicized a refugee case involving a Guyanese who he had successfully represented in Canada.

Mars

No Balance Scheet. No schedule of Assets.

 

Depreciation of what ? $ 727,000 depreciation of assets ?

 

Purchases of over two million ?

Purchase of what ? Three cardboard computers ?

 

No opening balance. What is going on ?

 

Where are the bank accounts ?

 

The video mentions 7 million dollars loaned to Katty. Where was the seven million spent ?

 

This makes my head spin. That is Jumbie accounting.

 

Statements Presented were NOT audited.

 

Guyanese, beware of the AFC crooks. The video exposes the AFC.

 

Beware. Beware.

FM
Last edited by Former Member
Originally Posted by warrior:
Originally Posted by kp:

Moses went from RED=PPPto YELLOW=AFC to GREEN=APNU to BLACK = PNC.

you saying the ppp is a racist Indian party and all Indian have to be a ppp member or they sold out and not Indian anymore you sure in the right part of the world

Moses playing musical chairs, one must ask ,what colour next? WHITE. His supporters are getting" swing head"

K

Is Cathy Hughes above public scrutiny?

SEPTEMBER 4, 2013 Â· BY STAFF WRITER Â· 10 COMMENTS   NEXT ARTICLE Âŧ

Print

Dear Editor,

Perception is everything in politics. Mrs Cathy Hughes being on the payroll of Sithe Global and making decisions in the AFC on Sithe does not seem right.  I as an ordinary person have forgiven Mr Nigel Hughes since he did the honourable thing and resigned from one of the entities he has been involved in, and even issued a public apology.

However, none of this was forthcoming from Mrs Cathy Hughes and it has been a month now.  Is she above public scrutiny?

Yours faithfully,
(Name and address provided)

 

extracted from the Stabroek News

FM

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×