- Share on Facebook
- Share on Twitter
- Share on Pinterest
- Share on LinkedIn
- Share on Reddit
- Copy Link to Topic
Replies sorted oldest to newest
A 46-year-old man has been charged with murder in the shooting death of three Muslim students in an apartment near the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill campus.
Police haven't said what may have compelled the accused, Craig Stephen Hicks, to allegedly carry out the attack Tuesday evening. He turned himself in to police later in the night.
But given the victims' religion and comments the alleged shooter apparently left on a Facebook page, many social media users wondered what role, if any, the victims' faith played.
The victims were Muslims: Deah Shaddy Barakat, 23; Yusor Mohammad, 21; and Razan Mohammad Abu-Salha, 19.
Barakat was Mohammad's husband; Abu-Salha was her sister, the school said.
Barakat was a second-year student at the UNC School of Dentistry, who was raising money on a fundraising site to provide dental care to Syrian refugees in Turkey.
He had been married for just over a month to Yusor Mohammad, who was planning to begin her dental studies at UNC in the fall, according to the school.
Abu-Salha was a student at North Carolina State University in Raleigh.
All three had been shot in the head, sources told CNN affiliate WRAL.
This is a crime. Also, it's a crime that is possibly motivated by religious hatred. We don't know yet.
Regardless, we can expect that he will be indicted by a Christian prosecutor, found guilty by a Christian jury, and sentenced by a Christian judge. In the U.S. and the rest of the infidel West, a Christian murdering members of a Muslim minority will be dealt with swiftly by the law. In the Islamic world, a Muslim can rape or murder a member of a Christian minority with impunity and the law will not act specifically because the life of a Christian is not worth the same as that of a Muslim.
From CNN this morning:
In one post widely shared online, Hicks, who claimed he is an atheist, allegedly wrote: "When it comes to insults, your religion started this, not me. If your religion kept its big mouth shut, so would I."
hmmmm . . . ?
Faux News spinning . . .
This is a crime. Also, it's a crime that is possibly motivated by religious hatred. We don't know yet.
Regardless, we can expect that he will be indicted by a Christian prosecutor, found guilty by a Christian jury, and sentenced by a Christian judge. In the U.S. and the rest of the infidel West, a Christian murdering members of a Muslim minority will be dealt with swiftly by the law. In the Islamic world, a Muslim can rape or murder a member of a Christian minority with impunity and the law will not act specifically because the life of a Christian is not worth the same as that of a Muslim.
Shaitaan 'deflecting' as per weasel norm. . . red herrings fast & furious
This is a crime. Also, it's a crime that is possibly motivated by religious hatred. We don't know yet.
Regardless, we can expect that he will be indicted by a Christian prosecutor, found guilty by a Christian jury, and sentenced by a Christian judge. In the U.S. and the rest of the infidel West, a Christian murdering members of a Muslim minority will be dealt with swiftly by the law. In the Islamic world, a Muslim can rape or murder a member of a Christian minority with impunity and the law will not act specifically because the life of a Christian is not worth the same as that of a Muslim.
Shaitaan 'deflecting' as per weasel norm. . . red herrings fast & furious
Redux...."trolling" as per your norm....twisting and quote mining
This is a crime. Also, it's a crime that is possibly motivated by religious hatred. We don't know yet.
Regardless, we can expect that he will be indicted by a Christian prosecutor, found guilty by a Christian jury, and sentenced by a Christian judge. In the U.S. and the rest of the infidel West, a Christian murdering members of a Muslim minority will be dealt with swiftly by the law. In the Islamic world, a Muslim can rape or murder a member of a Christian minority with impunity and the law will not act specifically because the life of a Christian is not worth the same as that of a Muslim.
Shaitaan 'deflecting' as per weasel norm. . . red herrings fast & furious
Redux...."trolling" as per your norm....twisting and quote mining
the public record in the age of the internet is y'all worst nightmare
if what it takes is "quote mining," "trolling," etc., to do the job, as long as i don't lie, it's all good
Parking spat linked to N.C. killing of 3 Muslim students


(Photo: Our Three Winners/Facebook)
An ongoing dispute over an apartment parking space may have led to the shooting deaths of three Muslim college students in North Carolina, but investigators are trying to determine if the killings could also have been hate-motivated, police said Wednesday.
Craig Stephen Hicks, 46, who turned himself in to the Chatham County Sheriff's Office, has been charged with three counts of first-degree murder in the fatal shootings Tuesday afternoon at an apartment building in Chapel Hill.
USA TODAY
Outrage surges over Muslim students murders
The victims, all shot in the head, were identified as Deah Shaddy Barakat, 23, and his wife, Yusor Mohammad, 21, of Chapel Hill, and Razan Mohammad Abu-Salha, 19, of Raleigh, police said. The two female victims were sisters.
Friends posted a Facebook page in their honor on Wednesday.

Craig Stephen Hicks, 46, shown in a booking photo was arrested in connection with the shooting of three Muslim students in Chapel Hill, N.C. , Feb.10. 2015. (Photo: Durham County Sheriff's office)
It was not immediately clear if the religion of the victims was a factor in the shootings.
Police said an ongoing dispute over a parking space may have led to the killings, but that investigators were looking into the reasons behind the "senseless and tragic act."
"We understand the concerns about the possibility that this was hate-motivated and we will exhaust every lead to determine if that is the case," Chapel Hill Police Chief Chris Blue said in a statement. "Our thoughts are with the families and friends of these young people who lost their lives so needlessly."
Nihad Awad, national executive director of the Council of American Islamic Relations, called on authorities Wednesday to determine as quickly as possible whether religion was a factor in the killings.
"Based on the brutal nature of this crime, the past anti-religion statements of the alleged perpetrator, the religious attire of two of the victims, and the rising anti-Muslim rhetoric in American society, we urge state and federal law enforcement authorities to quickly address speculation of a possible bias motive in this case," Awad said in a statement.
The killings triggered an outcry overnight on Twitter -- under the hashtag #MuslimLivesMatter -- by those who feel the victims were marked by their religion.
The triple-murder in this quiet college town shocked friends and neighbors.
"It's a very quiet community," resident Bethany Boring told WRAL-TV. "It's a lot of graduate and professional students. You know, professional families."
Barakat, a second-year dental student at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and Yusor Mohammad were married in late December. They traveled to Turkey last year to provide free dental care to students, according to their friends' Facebook page.
Contributing: Associated Press
sad
what the heck wrong with you American
Guyana looks good. In Guyana they kill for money, in America they kill for nothing-- non Christian.
what the heck wrong with you American
some are cucoo
Chapel Hill shooting deaths motivated by neighbour dispute over parking, police say
Michael Biesecker, Associated Press | February 11, 2015 10:55 AM ET, Source - National Post
This image provided by the Durham County Sheriff's Office shows a booking photo of Craig Stephen Hicks, 46, who was arrested on three counts of murder early Wednesday, Feb. 11, 2015. He is being held at the Durham County Jail. Police were responding to a report of gunshots around 5:15 p.m. Tuesday when they found three people who were pronounced dead at the scene.
CHAPEL HILL, N.C. â An ongoing parking dispute between neighbours sparked the shooting deaths of three family members at a quiet condominium complex near the University of North Carolina campus, police said Wednesday.
Craig Stephen Hicks, 46, was charged with three counts of first-degree murder in the Tuesday shooting, Chapel Hill police said. He is being held at the Durham County Jail and was expected to make a first court appearance Wednesday morning.
Police say Hicks is co-operating, and that their preliminary investigation showed that the parking dispute was the motive.
The victims were identified as Deah Shaddy Barakat, 23, Yusor Mohammad, 21, and Razan Mohammad Abu-Salha, 19.
Barakat and Mohammad were married, and Abu-Salha was Mohammadâs sister, according to UNC.

Barakat was a second-year dental student there, and Yusor was scheduled to begin dental studies in the fall.
Both had graduated from North Carolina State University, school spokesman Mick Kulikowski said. Barakat graduated with a business administration degree in the spring of 2013. Mohammad graduated in December with a biological sciences degree.
Abu-Salha was a second-year design major who had started classes last fall, Kulikowski said.
The neighbourhood where they were found â immediately east of campus â consists mostly of apartments and condominiums rented by students. Neighbours there said Wednesday morning that never before seen police or had crime problems.
âItâs a very quiet community,â resident Bethany Boring told WRAL-TV. âItâs a lot of graduate and professional students. You know, professional families.â
sad three young people lives gone
for a parking spot.
Rednecks Dogs are a DANGER to America!!! Sad indeed!!! I would not live in the South!!!

This is just plain stupid. It's all over the news.
sad three young people lives gone
for a parking spot.
That's how the redneck family is spinning it. North Carolina is a redneck state. It's sad to see three young lives wiped off the face of the earth in a flash. I still believe it's a hate crime.
This is just plain stupid. It's all over the news.
It took over 13 hours for the main stream media to cover it and only after social media started to lambast them. and even then it was only given a few mins.
https://twitter.com/ozchrisroc...561845332070400?s=04
boy what a different news day in America would it be if this is what the killer looked like #ChapelHillShooting
sad three young people lives gone
for a parking spot.
What parking spot.
This is just plain stupid. It's all over the news.
It took over 13 hours for the main stream media to cover it and only after social media started to lambast them. and even then it was only given a few mins.
There are many reasons why there could be a delay in the mainstream media getting a story. To simply speculate that it's because these victims were Muslim, the media deliberately withheld coverage on the story is simply ludicrous. I was working from home this morning and the TV was on CNN. The story was on their revolving list of stories being run every hour and it is still there so what nonsense are you talking about a few minutes. I checked news sites on the Internet such as Google News, CNN and even Faux News when I heard this ridiculous claim and the story was right at the top. If you were to check news sites right now it is still there. All the major newspapers websites have the story. There is blanket coverage on this story so stop your whining and lying.
A failed attempt to whip up the false narrative of murderous American Islamophobia against our poor innocent Muslim population.
Three people were killed over a parking spot. It's terrible. But it's routine rage murder. This wasn't a man driven by a political agenda, member of an extremist militant organization, bent on murdering Muslims to bring into reality Jesus' Caliphate. The fact that he killed three "Muslims" is the least relevant point of this whole story.
The murderer is an atheist. Atheists make anti-religious remarks all the time. To everyone. An atheist will go to a restaurant an order a table "for two atheists." I'm not sure atheism is a motivation for murder.
sad three young people lives gone
for a parking spot.
What parking spot.
A roommate of the victims who lived in the condo stated that there was an ongoing parking dispute between the victims and the man who is accused of killing them. He came to their condo a few times to complain and he also complained to the property managers that they were not parking in their assigned spots. The wife of the accused also confirmed that there was a dispute between her husband and the victims. Not that I believe that they should be killed for illegally parking but this is what was reported.
sad three young people lives gone
for a parking spot.
What parking spot.
A roommate of the victims who lived in the condo stated that there was an ongoing parking dispute between the victims and the man who is accused of killing them. He came to their condo a few times to complain and he also complained to the property managers that they were not parking in their assigned spots. The wife of the accused also confirmed that there was a dispute between her husband and the victims. Not that I believe that they should be killed for illegally parking but this is what was reported.
Sounds like these students just messed with the wrong dude.
Almost everyone who lives near a university knows just how awful students are to the local resident especially when it comes to parking and noise pollution.
The fact that this guy personally complained to them tells me he was most likely in the right and made a good faith effort to work it out. Then he went to their property manager after they blew him off. And then he lost it one day.
Lots of murders happen this way. Victims behave unreasonable in a social situation. Murderer flips out at their lack of reason and loses it.
This is just plain stupid. It's all over the news.
It took over 13 hours for the main stream media to cover it and only after social media started to lambast them. and even then it was only given a few mins.
There are many reasons why there could be a delay in the mainstream media getting a story. To simply speculate that it's because these victims were Muslim, the media deliberately withheld coverage on the story is simply ludicrous. I was working from home this morning and the TV was on CNN. The story was on their revolving list of stories being run every hour and it is still there so what nonsense are you talking about a few minutes. I checked news sites on the Internet such as Google News, CNN and even Faux News when I heard this ridiculous claim and the story was right at the top. If you were to check news sites right now it is still there. All the major newspapers websites have the story. There is blanket coverage on this story so stop your whining and lying.
So you are saying that if the shooter was a Muslim and the victims were non muslims the same would have happened?
This incident happened yesterday afternoon not this morning.
The first news outlet to carry this story was not from the US bit the Independent in ENGLAND
Muslims, though not a race or tribe, must have a gene for lying. The human genome project should look into this.
Probably everyone in America and the whole world knows about this story for the sole reason that they are Muslims.
This is how special and protected you people are. If these were three black people, we wouldn't know about this. The media doesn't run headlines like "Three Black Christians Killed Over Parking Spot."
The bodies aren't even cold yet but you professional Muslim victims are already looking at ways to milk this for maximum political advantage.
I'm sure the usual choir of useful kuffar idiots will rub your shoulders and tell you how sorry they are that you Muslims must endure the modern day Holocaust that is America for Muslims.
This is just plain stupid. It's all over the news.
It took over 13 hours for the main stream media to cover it and only after social media started to lambast them. and even then it was only given a few mins.
There are many reasons why there could be a delay in the mainstream media getting a story. To simply speculate that it's because these victims were Muslim, the media deliberately withheld coverage on the story is simply ludicrous. I was working from home this morning and the TV was on CNN. The story was on their revolving list of stories being run every hour and it is still there so what nonsense are you talking about a few minutes. I checked news sites on the Internet such as Google News, CNN and even Faux News when I heard this ridiculous claim and the story was right at the top. If you were to check news sites right now it is still there. All the major newspapers websites have the story. There is blanket coverage on this story so stop your whining and lying.
So you are saying that if the shooter was a Muslim and the victims were non muslims the same would have happened?
This incident happened yesterday afternoon not this morning.
The first news outlet to carry this story was not from the US bit the Independent in ENGLAND
Once again. There are many reasons why there could be a delay in the mainstream media getting a story. To simply speculate that it's because these victims were Muslim, the media deliberately withheld coverage on the story is simply ludicrous.
A parking dispute in Hicksville does not necessarily get media attention right away.
Actually the only reason why it is getting national coverage is because there are Muslim victims. If it was one crazy redneck killing three more over a parking spot, it might have never gone national.
This is just plain stupid. It's all over the news.
It took over 13 hours for the main stream media to cover it and only after social media started to lambast them. and even then it was only given a few mins.
There are many reasons why there could be a delay in the mainstream media getting a story. To simply speculate that it's because these victims were Muslim, the media deliberately withheld coverage on the story is simply ludicrous. I was working from home this morning and the TV was on CNN. The story was on their revolving list of stories being run every hour and it is still there so what nonsense are you talking about a few minutes. I checked news sites on the Internet such as Google News, CNN and even Faux News when I heard this ridiculous claim and the story was right at the top. If you were to check news sites right now it is still there. All the major newspapers websites have the story. There is blanket coverage on this story so stop your whining and lying.
So you are saying that if the shooter was a Muslim and the victims were non muslims the same would have happened?
This incident happened yesterday afternoon not this morning.
The first news outlet to carry this story was not from the US bit the Independent in ENGLAND
Once again. There are many reasons why there could be a delay in the mainstream media getting a story. To simply speculate that it's because these victims were Muslim, the media deliberately withheld coverage on the story is simply ludicrous.
A parking dispute in Hicksville does not necessarily get media attention right away.
Actually the only reason why it is getting national coverage is because there are Muslim victims. If it was one crazy redneck killing three more over a parking spot, it might have never gone national.
So you saying that the media is not bias against Muslims?
So you saying that the media is not bias against Muslims?
Here we go. Crazy Muslim conspiracy shyte. Where would our current events be without the biased media, the CIA, International Jews, and the Mossad?
The media is quite biased when in comes to Muslims. Biased in their favor. Which is why the American media censors Muhammad cartoons, South Park censored Muhammad, why "Islamophobia" is a word, and why we're talking about three Muslims who got shot because they couldn't stop parking in their neighbor's spot.
We would not be talking about any other people who got shot for something so remarkably stupid and trivial. Only Muslims.
This is just plain stupid. It's all over the news.
It took over 13 hours for the main stream media to cover it and only after social media started to lambast them. and even then it was only given a few mins.
There are many reasons why there could be a delay in the mainstream media getting a story. To simply speculate that it's because these victims were Muslim, the media deliberately withheld coverage on the story is simply ludicrous. I was working from home this morning and the TV was on CNN. The story was on their revolving list of stories being run every hour and it is still there so what nonsense are you talking about a few minutes. I checked news sites on the Internet such as Google News, CNN and even Faux News when I heard this ridiculous claim and the story was right at the top. If you were to check news sites right now it is still there. All the major newspapers websites have the story. There is blanket coverage on this story so stop your whining and lying.
So you are saying that if the shooter was a Muslim and the victims were non muslims the same would have happened?
This incident happened yesterday afternoon not this morning.
The first news outlet to carry this story was not from the US bit the Independent in ENGLAND
Once again. There are many reasons why there could be a delay in the mainstream media getting a story. To simply speculate that it's because these victims were Muslim, the media deliberately withheld coverage on the story is simply ludicrous.
A parking dispute in Hicksville does not necessarily get media attention right away.
Actually the only reason why it is getting national coverage is because there are Muslim victims. If it was one crazy redneck killing three more over a parking spot, it might have never gone national.
So you saying that the media is not bias against Muslims?
To say that the media is biased against Muslims is simply being ignorant of what makes up the media and how they operate. The media is a broad representation of many different organizations with several different owners and agendas. Some no doubt have anti-Muslim biases, some are Muslim friendly and some are generally neutral.
This is just plain stupid. It's all over the news.
It took over 13 hours for the main stream media to cover it and only after social media started to lambast them. and even then it was only given a few mins.
There are many reasons why there could be a delay in the mainstream media getting a story. To simply speculate that it's because these victims were Muslim, the media deliberately withheld coverage on the story is simply ludicrous. I was working from home this morning and the TV was on CNN. The story was on their revolving list of stories being run every hour and it is still there so what nonsense are you talking about a few minutes. I checked news sites on the Internet such as Google News, CNN and even Faux News when I heard this ridiculous claim and the story was right at the top. If you were to check news sites right now it is still there. All the major newspapers websites have the story. There is blanket coverage on this story so stop your whining and lying.
So you are saying that if the shooter was a Muslim and the victims were non muslims the same would have happened?
This incident happened yesterday afternoon not this morning.
The first news outlet to carry this story was not from the US bit the Independent in ENGLAND
Once again. There are many reasons why there could be a delay in the mainstream media getting a story. To simply speculate that it's because these victims were Muslim, the media deliberately withheld coverage on the story is simply ludicrous.
A parking dispute in Hicksville does not necessarily get media attention right away.
Actually the only reason why it is getting national coverage is because there are Muslim victims. If it was one crazy redneck killing three more over a parking spot, it might have never gone national.
So you saying that the media is not bias against Muslims?
To say that the media is biased against Muslims is simply being ignorant of what makes up the media and how they operate. The media is a broad representation of many different organizations with several different owners and agendas. Some no doubt have anti-Muslim biases, some are Muslim friendly and some are generally neutral.
So how come when similar incidents happens and the Muslim is the perpetrator he is cslled a terrorist and when a non muslim is the perpetrator he is anything but a terrorist. And in the majority of cases the non muslim perpetrator is deemed to be a mental case before he is evaluated.
This is just plain stupid. It's all over the news.
It took over 13 hours for the main stream media to cover it and only after social media started to lambast them. and even then it was only given a few mins.
There are many reasons why there could be a delay in the mainstream media getting a story. To simply speculate that it's because these victims were Muslim, the media deliberately withheld coverage on the story is simply ludicrous. I was working from home this morning and the TV was on CNN. The story was on their revolving list of stories being run every hour and it is still there so what nonsense are you talking about a few minutes. I checked news sites on the Internet such as Google News, CNN and even Faux News when I heard this ridiculous claim and the story was right at the top. If you were to check news sites right now it is still there. All the major newspapers websites have the story. There is blanket coverage on this story so stop your whining and lying.
So you are saying that if the shooter was a Muslim and the victims were non muslims the same would have happened?
This incident happened yesterday afternoon not this morning.
The first news outlet to carry this story was not from the US bit the Independent in ENGLAND
Once again. There are many reasons why there could be a delay in the mainstream media getting a story. To simply speculate that it's because these victims were Muslim, the media deliberately withheld coverage on the story is simply ludicrous.
A parking dispute in Hicksville does not necessarily get media attention right away.
Actually the only reason why it is getting national coverage is because there are Muslim victims. If it was one crazy redneck killing three more over a parking spot, it might have never gone national.
So you saying that the media is not bias against Muslims?
To say that the media is biased against Muslims is simply being ignorant of what makes up the media and how they operate. The media is a broad representation of many different organizations with several different owners and agendas. Some no doubt have anti-Muslim biases, some are Muslim friendly and some are generally neutral.
So how come when similar incidents happens and the Muslim is the perpetrator he is cslled a terrorist and when a non muslim is the perpetrator he is anything but a terrorist. And in the majority of cases the non muslim perpetrator is deemed to be a mental case before he is evaluated.
Because Muslim terrorists are Muslim terrorists. And criminals are criminals. And criminals who are mentally insane are criminals who are mentally insane.
Stop fishing for tales of Muslim victim hood. They are few.
The moral of this story is to not be wrang and strang and maybe some madman won't shoot you in your head for said wrang and strang behavior.
So how come when similar incidents happens and the Muslim is the perpetrator he is cslled a terrorist and when a non muslim is the perpetrator he is anything but a terrorist. And in the majority of cases the non muslim perpetrator is deemed to be a mental case before he is evaluated.
This is a parking dispute between neighbors gone bad. Seems a bit different to the contemporary standard definition of terrorism, don't you think?
The moral of this story is to not be wrang and strang and maybe some madman won't shoot you in your head for said wrang and strang behavior.
Where is it reported that the victims were wrong and strong?
So how come when similar incidents happens and the Muslim is the perpetrator he is cslled a terrorist and when a non muslim is the perpetrator he is anything but a terrorist. And in the majority of cases the non muslim perpetrator is deemed to be a mental case before he is evaluated.
This is a parking dispute between neighbors gone bad. Seems a bit different to the contemporary standard definition of terrorism, don't you think?
It is a pity the victims cant tell their side of the story
The moral of this story is to not be wrang and strang and maybe some madman won't shoot you in your head for said wrang and strang behavior.
Where is it reported that the victims were wrong and strong?
It seems from numerous news reports that the victims were parking in his spot despite numerous complaints over lengthy periods of time to them personally and to their property manager from the murderer.
Look, no one is saying one should get shot in the head for being an ass. I just think it's disingenuous when we all pretend that we don't understand that this dude was dealing with some jackasses who happened to be Muslims and he lost it one day when they finally parked in his spot one time too many.
I wouldn't shoot a person in the head over a parking spot, but I live in NYC...I understand his frustration.
So how come when similar incidents happens and the Muslim is the perpetrator he is cslled a terrorist and when a non muslim is the perpetrator he is anything but a terrorist. And in the majority of cases the non muslim perpetrator is deemed to be a mental case before he is evaluated.
This is a parking dispute between neighbors gone bad. Seems a bit different to the contemporary standard definition of terrorism, don't you think?
It is a pity the victims cant tell their side of the story
They would have been able to if they didn't keep bothering and inciting the wrong man over his parking spot.
. . . Where would our current events be without the biased media, the CIA, International Jews, and the Mossad?
whaderaas . . . wha kind of sick manoeuvre is this?
are you so bereft and idle that u need to manufacture talking points out of absolutely nothing to ride . . .
. . . Where would our current events be without the biased media, the CIA, International Jews, and the Mossad?
whaderaas . . . wha kind of sick manoeuvre is this?
are you so bereft and idle that u need to manufacture talking points out of absolutely nothing to ride . . .
The word is "maneuver." We're in America. Only pretentious stupid people feel the need to resort to the British spelling without some highly specific context. This wasn't one of them.
I trust this finds favour, inter alia, with my Most Brittanic interlocutor.
It seems from numerous news reports that the victims were parking in his spot despite numerous complaints over lengthy periods of time to them personally and to their property manager from the murderer.
Look, no one is saying one should get shot in the head for being an ass. I just think it's disingenuous when we all pretend that we don't understand that this dude was dealing with some jackasses who happened to be Muslims and he lost it one day when they finally parked in his spot one time too many.
I wouldn't shoot a person in the head over a parking spot, but I live in NYC...I understand his frustration.
Was this apartment either affiliated, associated or referred by the school? Was it located on property under the school jurisdiction?
It seems from numerous news reports that the victims were parking in his spot despite numerous complaints over lengthy periods of time to them personally and to their property manager from the murderer.
Look, no one is saying one should get shot in the head for being an ass. I just think it's disingenuous when we all pretend that we don't understand that this dude was dealing with some jackasses who happened to be Muslims and he lost it one day when they finally parked in his spot one time too many.
I wouldn't shoot a person in the head over a parking spot, but I live in NYC...I understand his frustration.
Was this apartment either affiliated, associated or referred by the school? Was it located on property under the school jurisdiction?
I don't know. They haven't gotten into the specifics of the parking dispute beyond what I already said. I'll post anything else I might come across.
And FYI, getting shot in parking disputes is waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay more common than getting shot for being Muslim.
P.S....this dude is a liberal atheist. Liberal atheists are not known for religious murders. He used his social media to bash all religions equally. Including Christians. Atheists tend to do that. Atheists are generally hostile to all silly beliefs about the man in the sky.
. . . Where would our current events be without the biased media, the CIA, International Jews, and the Mossad?
whaderaas . . . wha kind of sick manoeuvre is this?
are you so bereft and idle that u need to manufacture talking points out of absolutely nothing to ride . . .
The word is "maneuver." We're in America. Only pretentious stupid people feel the need to resort to the British spelling without some highly specific context. This wasn't one of them.
I trust this finds favour, inter alia, with my Most Brittanic interlocutor.
whatever senor red herring . . . i do confess to never quite coming to terms with the feel and look of "maneuver"
now that we got THAT 'important' shyte out of the way, care to deal . . .
. . . Where would our current events be without the biased media, the CIA, International Jews, and the Mossad?
whaderaas . . . wha kind of sick manoeuvre is this?
are you so bereft and idle that u need to manufacture talking points out of absolutely nothing to ride . . .
The word is "maneuver." We're in America. Only pretentious stupid people feel the need to resort to the British spelling without some highly specific context. This wasn't one of them.
I trust this finds favour, inter alia, with my Most Brittanic interlocutor.
whatever senor red herring . . . i do confess to never quite coming to terms with the feel and look of "maneuver"
now that we got THAT 'important' shyte out of the way, care to deal . . .
So in reports and emails to your American colleagues, superiors, and subordinates you've just been throwing British words at them?
. . . Where would our current events be without the biased media, the CIA, International Jews, and the Mossad?
whaderaas . . . what kind of sick manoeuvre is this?
are you so bereft and idle that u need to manufacture talking points out of absolutely nothing to ride . . .
I don't know. They haven't gotten into the specifics of the parking dispute beyond what I already said. I'll post anything else I might come across.
And FYI, getting shot in parking disputes is waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay more common than getting shot for being Muslim.
P.S....this dude is a liberal atheist. Liberal atheists are not known for religious murders. He used his social media to bash all religions equally. Including Christians. Atheists tend to do that. Atheists are generally hostile to all silly beliefs about the man in the sky.
You may note that I have not jumped on the Muslim angle as motivation. That is because the investigation does not conclusively state such. Likewise none of the articles that I saw make any reference to the victims parking in what is the shooter's officially assigned parking. So your comment that the victims were wrong and strong s without merit.
You may note that I have not jumped on the Muslim angle as motivation. That is because the investigation does not conclusively state such. Likewise none of the articles that I saw make any reference to the victims parking in what is the shooter's officially assigned parking. So your comment that the victims were wrong and strong s without merit.
I note that you're not joining the Islamophone Posse Comitatus.
Here is a BBC article about these people parking in this dude's two RESERVED parking spots:
Check out the anti-Semitic, anti-Zionist, pro Islamic terrorism, and anti-white "supremacist" social media rants of the victims.
http://gotnews.com/analysis-ch...an-terrorist-tweets/
They didn't deserve to get killed at all. But getting killed over a parking spot should not be grounds for deification. These are the so-called "peaceful" Muslims.
I can totally see how these anti-white anti-West anti-American anti-Israel anti-Jew Muslims could not bring themselves to respect the very reasonable requests of their infidel Christian neighbor to his property rights.
Check out the anti-Semitic, anti-Zionist, pro Islamic terrorism, and anti-white "supremacist" social media rants of the victims.
http://gotnews.com/analysis-ch...an-terrorist-tweets/
They didn't deserve to get killed at all. But getting killed over a parking spot should not be grounds for deification. These are the so-called "peaceful" Muslims.
I can totally see how these anti-white anti-West anti-American anti-Israel anti-Jew Muslims could not bring themselves to respect the very reasonable requests of their infidel Christian neighbor to his property rights.
Check out the anti-Semitic, anti-Zionist, pro Islamic terrorism, and anti-white "supremacist" social media rants of the victims.
http://gotnews.com/analysis-ch...an-terrorist-tweets/
They didn't deserve to get killed at all. But getting killed over a parking spot should not be grounds for deification. These are the so-called "peaceful" Muslims . . .
"deification" huh . . . when u got nothing, just make shyte up, eh?
i suggest u take time out to also look up the word "courage" when contemplating the punk in the mirror flexing over the corpses of murdered innocents
btw, Charles C. Johnson is not looking for interns . . . he likes keeping all the 'donated' money for himself
Check out the anti-Semitic, anti-Zionist, pro Islamic terrorism, and anti-white "supremacist" social media rants of the victims.
http://gotnews.com/analysis-ch...an-terrorist-tweets/
They didn't deserve to get killed at all. But getting killed over a parking spot should not be grounds for deification. These are the so-called "peaceful" Muslims . . .
"deification" huh . . . when u got nothing, just make shyte up, eh?
i suggest u take time out to also look up the word "courage" when contemplating the punk in the mirror flexing over the corpses of murdered innocents
btw, Charles C. Johnson is not looking for interns . . . he likes keeping all the 'donated' money for himself
Holy Brahmanical Cow Chap,
I once had a stalker sweethoman many moons ago but she was down right normal compared to you
I yearn for the days of **** who would at least disappear once in a blue moon
Check out the anti-Semitic, anti-Zionist, pro Islamic terrorism, and anti-white "supremacist" social media rants of the victims.
http://gotnews.com/analysis-ch...an-terrorist-tweets/
They didn't deserve to get killed at all. But getting killed over a parking spot should not be grounds for deification. These are the so-called "peaceful" Muslims . . .
"deification" huh . . . when u got nothing, just make shyte up, eh?
i suggest u take time out to also look up the word "courage" when contemplating the punk in the mirror flexing over the corpses of murdered innocents
btw, Charles C. Johnson is not looking for interns . . . he likes keeping all the 'donated' money for himself
Holy Brahmanical Cow Chap,
I once had a stalker sweethoman many moons ago but she was down right normal compared to you
I yearn for the days of **** who would at least disappear once in a blue moon
rev used to complain bitterly too . . . sunlight is a bitch for cockroaches
i understand
i understand
I would be more than happy to respond to intelligent (even semi-intelligent) dialogue. When you're ready, I'll be here.
i understand
I would be more than happy to respond to intelligent (even semi-intelligent) dialogue. When you're ready, I'll be here.
good, then STFU and "not" respond . . . arite?
i understand
I would be more than happy to respond to intelligent (even semi-intelligent) dialogue. When you're ready, I'll be here.
good, then STFU and "not" respond . . . arite?
What a perfect example of a little troll on an online site. Your responses are so beyond infantile, I am truly at a loss for words except to patronize you and wish you the best.
I can't even lose my temper with you. You're just too childish.
8 o' clock in the forenoon and a grown man is trying to pick an online cuss down. You must have personal issues bai.
i understand
I would be more than happy to respond to intelligent (even semi-intelligent) dialogue. When you're ready, I'll be here.
good, then STFU and "not" respond . . . arite?
What a perfect example of a little troll on an online site. Your responses are so beyond infantile, I am truly at a loss for words except to patronize you and wish you the best.
I can't even lose my temper with you. You're just too childish.
yah yeah yeah . . . so u doan like people looking under your skirt
good! that's why i am here
i understand
I would be more than happy to respond to intelligent (even semi-intelligent) dialogue. When you're ready, I'll be here.
good, then STFU and "not" respond . . . arite?
What a perfect example of a little troll on an online site. Your responses are so beyond infantile, I am truly at a loss for words except to patronize you and wish you the best.
I can't even lose my temper with you. You're just too childish.
yah yeah yeah . . . so u doan like people looking under your skirt
good! that's why i am here
grown "man." internet. 8:30am.
i understand
I would be more than happy to respond to intelligent (even semi-intelligent) dialogue. When you're ready, I'll be here.
good, then STFU and "not" respond . . . arite?
What a perfect example of a little troll on an online site. Your responses are so beyond infantile, I am truly at a loss for words except to patronize you and wish you the best.
I can't even lose my temper with you. You're just too childish.
yah yeah yeah . . . so u doan like people looking under your skirt
good! that's why i am here
grown "man." internet. 8:30am.
uh uh . . . i am on cockroach patrol
not too good a thing for u
Check out the anti-Semitic, anti-Zionist, pro Islamic terrorism, and anti-white "supremacist" social media rants of the victims.
http://gotnews.com/analysis-ch...an-terrorist-tweets/
They didn't deserve to get killed at all. But getting killed over a parking spot should not be grounds for deification. These are the so-called "peaceful" Muslims.
I can totally see how these anti-white anti-West anti-American anti-Israel anti-Jew Muslims could not bring themselves to respect the very reasonable requests of their infidel Christian neighbor to his property rights.
I suspect that some Muslims will milk this situation just as you milk the ones you do but I am not interested in that approach. There is just too much anger and the only way to fix that is to once take the high road rather than seek revenge and hopefully it will catch on. I don't have a twitter account but if I did I would have quoted the Qur'an #"an eye for an eye but forgiveness is best". Also, I am not ready to conclude on the motive especially since the local law enforcement agencies have not for their conclusions.
Make duas for the deceased and their family.So you and brilliant young people cut down in thier prime.
Again lets pay attention to every type of violence and murder for they are all wrong, be it the shooting up of Hedbo office in Paris or the killing of these three innocent muslims.
Well, the Party of Allah-USA Branch can be as angry as they like. And they will take the "high road" as in obey the secular infidel law because the alternative is a cold domestic prison cell or sunny Guantanamo Bay. The infidel majority still maintains the coercive powers of the State even though our liberals seem to have lost their minds when it comes to all things Allah.
Ironically, the excessive demands for privilege of Muslims, their constant public whining, their false claims of discrimination and/or American Muslim Holocaust will keep them as a front burner issue. They are their own worse enemy.
Well, the Party of Allah-USA Branch can be as angry as they like. And they will take the "high road" as in obey the secular infidel law because the alternative is a cold domestic prison cell or sunny Guantanamo Bay. The infidel majority still maintains the coercive powers of the State even though our liberals seem to have lost their minds when it comes to all things Allah.
Ironically, the excessive demands for privilege of Muslims, their constant public whining, their false claims of discrimination and/or American Muslim Holocaust will keep them as a front burner issue. They are their own worse enemy.
It will do you some good to get out from under the rock where you exist. I am willing to suggest that disobeying the infidels laws is done more by the infidels than the party of Allah - US Branch. Newsflash, everybody demands the right to be recognized in America. The Jews are constantly advocating for more rights. So are African Americans. Muslims are no less worthy of this advocacy. After all they also pay taxes. You hatred is harmful only to your karma. But it is after all a free country so you are free to screw up your karma if you so choose.
Well, the Party of Allah-USA Branch can be as angry as they like. And they will take the "high road" as in obey the secular infidel law because the alternative is a cold domestic prison cell or sunny Guantanamo Bay. The infidel majority still maintains the coercive powers of the State even though our liberals seem to have lost their minds when it comes to all things Allah.
Ironically, the excessive demands for privilege of Muslims, their constant public whining, their false claims of discrimination and/or American Muslim Holocaust will keep them as a front burner issue. They are their own worse enemy.
It will do you some good to get out from under the rock where you exist. I am willing to suggest that disobeying the infidels laws is done more by the infidels than the party of Allah - US Branch. Newsflash, everybody demands the right to be recognized in America. The Jews are constantly advocating for more rights. So are African Americans. Muslims are no less worthy of this advocacy. After all they also pay taxes. You hatred is harmful only to your karma. But it is after all a free country so you are free to screw up your karma if you so choose.
My Dear Friend,
If you must know, I do try to get out from under my rock as often as I can.
Permit me to draw a line between the ordinary criminality of individuals committed for individual purposes and individual gains. Our society can handle these individuals. If these individuals even happen to be "Muslim", even that doesn't matter. No one is concerned about Muslim "ordinary crime."
What concerns us infidels are the pathological behaviors of Muslims which seem to arise out of Islam and which threaten the foundations or at least undermine it significantly. For example, while you Muslims do not have the power to order the New York Times to shut down you have successfully censored them by "chilling" their speech. The NYT and most major Western papers will not put a cartoon of Muhammad in their paper no matter how newsworthy. This bothers me more than all the ISIS beheadings put together. The problem for me is that this censorship of the NYT finds broad support amongst the Party of God-USA Branch. This is worrisome. The political/public culture of Muslims is corrosive to a democracy especially as you all have remarkably found some useful white idiots on the left wing who think all brown people must be patronized in whatever stupid thing we do.
Jews are not arguing and acting as a group that is undermining our democracy and democratic culture. Also, they're not blowing up office towers with civilian airliners.
Paying your taxes entitle you to nothing. That's not an argument. You are entitled to no more and no less rights than any other individual. While the law does protect vulnerable groups like racial, ethnic, sexual minorities, it doesn't protect silly beliefs from public ridicule. The law protects people not ideas (particularly bad ideas).
All infidels will protect your right to knock your head on concrete five times a day and extol the virtues of a 7th century tribal warlord. However, you will never have a "right" to be immune from criticism for anything.
In America, freedom of religion means just that...freedom to believe and practice. Not a right to cow the non-believers into abiding by your beliefs (especially your maniacal beliefs about cartoons).
Well, the Party of Allah-USA Branch can be as angry as they like. And they will take the "high road" as in obey the secular infidel law because the alternative is a cold domestic prison cell or sunny Guantanamo Bay. The infidel majority still maintains the coercive powers of the State even though our liberals seem to have lost their minds when it comes to all things Allah.
Ironically, the excessive demands for privilege of Muslims, their constant public whining, their false claims of discrimination and/or American Muslim Holocaust will keep them as a front burner issue. They are their own worse enemy.
It will do you some good to get out from under the rock where you exist. I am willing to suggest that disobeying the infidels laws is done more by the infidels than the party of Allah - US Branch. Newsflash, everybody demands the right to be recognized in America. The Jews are constantly advocating for more rights. So are African Americans. Muslims are no less worthy of this advocacy. After all they also pay taxes. You hatred is harmful only to your karma. But it is after all a free country so you are free to screw up your karma if you so choose.
Bro Kaz,
This is deep!!!
Jumah Muarak.
Meanwhile, back here on Earth, three students were shot (who happened to be Muslim and also may have liked to eat roast beef amidst other irrelevant personal data) in the head because they provoked some dude with a serious anger management problem once too often. A crime for which the law will punish him most severely for. #SomeDudeKills3HumansOverParkingSpot
this is a literal punk lie!
the NY Daily News, the Washington Post, the Wall Street Journal, USA Today, NY Post, LA Times, all published Charlie Hebdo's defiant cover, featuring Muhammad, in the wake of the Paris terror
the NY Times was singular in not reprinting
as with all sociopath louts, you will post any hysterical fabrication, no matter how unimaginative, to get attention
The Charlie Hebdo Mohammed cartoons: Media outlets shy away or take a stand
In the wake of Wednesday's killings at the Paris offices of Charlie Hebdo, most major media outlets are choosing not to republish the French magazine's satirical but highly controversial cartoons depicting the Prophet Mohammed.
But The Washington Post did choose to show one of the images in Thursday's print edition. "I think seeing the cover will help readers understand what this is all about," editorial page editor Fred Hiatt told The Post's Erik Wemple.
Several popular news web sites have also published slide shows of Charlie Hebdo cartoons.
Elsewhere, the news instinct to show the cartoons and express support for the slain journalists is countered by concerns about safety and sensitivity. Depictions of Mohammed are a strict taboo within Islam.
It's brought forth a fierce debate among journalists.
What some are calling sensitivity, others are calling censorship -- an acquiescence to terrorists. There has been widespread speculation that Wednesday's attack was motivated by the publication's criticism of religion.
CNN, the owner of this web site, is among the news outlets that has verbally described Charlie Hebdo's cartoons but refrained from showing them. The network has made similar decisions about depictions of Mohammed in the past.
In the network's daily editorial meeting on Thursday morning, CNN Worldwide president Jeff Zucker addressed the decision.
"Journalistically, every bone says we want to use and should use" the cartoons, Zucker said. But "as managers, protecting and taking care of the safety of our employees around the world is more important right now."
On Wednesday, the Associated Press, the world's largest news gathering operation, said it has a "longstanding policy" to "not move deliberately provocative images on the wire," according to a spokesman. This includes depictions of Mohammed.
The New York Times, "after careful consideration," also decided that "describing the cartoons" would suffice, according to a spokeswoman.
NBC News said Wednesday that the network will not be showing "headlines or cartoons that could be viewed as insensitive or offensive," and that guidance also applies to CNBC and MSNBC.
Another major network, ABC News, has taken the same position.
A CBS News executive, meanwhile, said the network had implemented no explicit ban on the Mohammed cartoons, but had instructed its producers to exercise judgment.
Fox News told Mediaite it has "no plans to air" the Mohammed cartoons, but it did publish them in an online slideshow.
Related: Marchers rally in solidarity with magazine
News outlets have to consider that many Muslims take offense to cartoons like the ones published by Charlie Hebdo. This is particularly consequential for news organizations with bureaus in the Middle East.
There have been sporadic incidents of violence against cartoonists and news outlets in the past.
But in the aftermath of the attack, a number of popular news websites decided to show some of the French magazine's provocative covers, including a 2011 image of Mohammed. Among them: BuzzFeed, Business Insider, The Huffington Post, Gawker and The Daily Beast.
On Wednesday morning, The Daily Beast updated a slide show it originally published in 2011, featuring 16 of the most "shocking" Charlie Hebdo covers.
Daily Beast executive editor Noah Shachtman said there was "zero hesitation" to run the slide show. For one, he said, the images had inherent news value. But the decision to publish the covers was more than that: It was "a show of solidarity."
"We're very much on the side of free expression everywhere. And especially in the face of this horrific attack, we want to show that we're with these brave editors, reporters and cartoonists," he said.
Shachtman also assailed the Associated Press, calling the news wire "gutless" for not showing the cartoons that featured Mohammed.
Related: Why Islam forbids images of Mohammed
Gawker editor-in-chief Max Read detailed the magazine's history in a post that included the 2011 Mohammed cover, which is believed to have sparked an attack on the newspaper's offices on the day it was scheduled to come out. He said the decision was a no-brainer.
"We ran the cartoons because they're newsworthy," Read told CNNMoney. "If we're going to discuss the controversial images that Charlie has published, we have a duty to our readers to show the images themselves (and to provide context to accompany them)."
"Whatever solidarity we end up showing for Charlie is a happy accident of doing our jobs," he added.
The Washington Free Beacon, a conservative website, republished "the cartoons that jihadist fanatics don't want you to see" as a salute to Charlie Hebdo.
The author of that piece, Lachlan Markay, said the images were a "good way of honoring the slain satirists by ensuring that people see the work for which they literally gave their lives."
"We didn't hesitate at all," Markay told CNNMoney. "Our decision seems even more appropriate (and necessary) in light of decisions by some major news organizations to censor or omit images of Charlie Hebdo covers in their writeups. I think those outlets are doing a grave disservice to the very idea of free expression."
This issue was brought to the forefront in 2005 after the Danish newspaper Jyllands-Posten ran several caricatures of the prophet. Those cartoons sparked violent protests, and many outlets opted against republishing them.
The irreverent animated comedy "South Park" waded into that particular controversy in 2006 with an episode that censored an image of Mohammed. The show's creators Matt Stone and Trey Parker tried to show Mohammed once again in 2010, but were once again denied by Comedy Central.
The Charlie Hebdo Mohammed cartoons: Media outlets shy away or take a stand
In the wake of Wednesday's killings at the Paris offices of Charlie Hebdo, most major media outlets are choosing not to republish the French magazine's satirical but highly controversial cartoons depicting the Prophet Mohammed.
But The Washington Post did choose to show one of the images in Thursday's print edition. "I think seeing the cover will help readers understand what this is all about," editorial page editor Fred Hiatt told The Post's Erik Wemple.
Several popular news web sites have also published slide shows of Charlie Hebdo cartoons.
Elsewhere, the news instinct to show the cartoons and express support for the slain journalists is countered by concerns about safety and sensitivity. Depictions of Mohammed are a strict taboo within Islam.
It's brought forth a fierce debate among journalists.
What some are calling sensitivity, others are calling censorship -- an acquiescence to terrorists. There has been widespread speculation that Wednesday's attack was motivated by the publication's criticism of religion.
CNN, the owner of this web site, is among the news outlets that has verbally described Charlie Hebdo's cartoons but refrained from showing them. The network has made similar decisions about depictions of Mohammed in the past.
In the network's daily editorial meeting on Thursday morning, CNN Worldwide president Jeff Zucker addressed the decision.
"Journalistically, every bone says we want to use and should use" the cartoons, Zucker said. But "as managers, protecting and taking care of the safety of our employees around the world is more important right now."
On Wednesday, the Associated Press, the world's largest news gathering operation, said it has a "longstanding policy" to "not move deliberately provocative images on the wire," according to a spokesman. This includes depictions of Mohammed.
The New York Times, "after careful consideration," also decided that "describing the cartoons" would suffice, according to a spokeswoman.
NBC News said Wednesday that the network will not be showing "headlines or cartoons that could be viewed as insensitive or offensive," and that guidance also applies to CNBC and MSNBC.
Another major network, ABC News, has taken the same position.
A CBS News executive, meanwhile, said the network had implemented no explicit ban on the Mohammed cartoons, but had instructed its producers to exercise judgment.
Fox News told Mediaite it has "no plans to air" the Mohammed cartoons, but it did publish them in an online slideshow.
Related: Marchers rally in solidarity with magazine
News outlets have to consider that many Muslims take offense to cartoons like the ones published by Charlie Hebdo. This is particularly consequential for news organizations with bureaus in the Middle East.
There have been sporadic incidents of violence against cartoonists and news outlets in the past.
But in the aftermath of the attack, a number of popular news websites decided to show some of the French magazine's provocative covers, including a 2011 image of Mohammed. Among them: BuzzFeed, Business Insider, The Huffington Post, Gawker and The Daily Beast.
On Wednesday morning, The Daily Beast updated a slide show it originally published in 2011, featuring 16 of the most "shocking" Charlie Hebdo covers.
Daily Beast executive editor Noah Shachtman said there was "zero hesitation" to run the slide show. For one, he said, the images had inherent news value. But the decision to publish the covers was more than that: It was "a show of solidarity."
"We're very much on the side of free expression everywhere. And especially in the face of this horrific attack, we want to show that we're with these brave editors, reporters and cartoonists," he said.
Shachtman also assailed the Associated Press, calling the news wire "gutless" for not showing the cartoons that featured Mohammed.
Related: Why Islam forbids images of Mohammed
Gawker editor-in-chief Max Read detailed the magazine's history in a post that included the 2011 Mohammed cover, which is believed to have sparked an attack on the newspaper's offices on the day it was scheduled to come out. He said the decision was a no-brainer.
"We ran the cartoons because they're newsworthy," Read told CNNMoney. "If we're going to discuss the controversial images that Charlie has published, we have a duty to our readers to show the images themselves (and to provide context to accompany them)."
"Whatever solidarity we end up showing for Charlie is a happy accident of doing our jobs," he added.
The Washington Free Beacon, a conservative website, republished "the cartoons that jihadist fanatics don't want you to see" as a salute to Charlie Hebdo.
The author of that piece, Lachlan Markay, said the images were a "good way of honoring the slain satirists by ensuring that people see the work for which they literally gave their lives."
"We didn't hesitate at all," Markay told CNNMoney. "Our decision seems even more appropriate (and necessary) in light of decisions by some major news organizations to censor or omit images of Charlie Hebdo covers in their writeups. I think those outlets are doing a grave disservice to the very idea of free expression."
This issue was brought to the forefront in 2005 after the Danish newspaper Jyllands-Posten ran several caricatures of the prophet. Those cartoons sparked violent protests, and many outlets opted against republishing them.
The irreverent animated comedy "South Park" waded into that particular controversy in 2006 with an episode that censored an image of Mohammed. The show's creators Matt Stone and Trey Parker tried to show Mohammed once again in 2010, but were once again denied by Comedy Central.
u are intelligent enough to understand that this lame attempt at ass-covering addresses neither your relevant post nor my response exposing your cowardly LIES
serviceable effort though; go pull your panties up . . . things are still showing
I always appreciate and enjoy an early morning exchange of ideas with you
I always appreciate and enjoy an early morning exchange of ideas with you
i don't engage in "exchange of ideas" with klown dissemblers . . . that's an IQ-lowering exercise
pay attention
I always appreciate and enjoy an early morning exchange of ideas with you
i don't engage in "exchange of ideas" with klown dissemblers . . . that's an IQ-lowering exercise
pay attention
My Dear Man Child,
I don't have the inclination to respond to people who are so disingenuous that they consistently resort to quote mining in a clear attempt to distort the point of a post. I trust the typical reader to get my point.
Trolls are kinda like naughty children....responding to their bad behavior only reinforces their bad behavior.
I always appreciate and enjoy an early morning exchange of ideas with you
i don't engage in "exchange of ideas" with klown dissemblers . . . that's an IQ-lowering exercise
pay attention
My Dear Man Child,
I don't have the inclination to respond to people who are so disingenuous that they consistently resort to quote mining in a clear attempt to distort the point of a post. I trust the typical reader to get my point.
Trolls are kinda like naughty children....responding to their bad behavior only reinforces their bad behavior.
ahmmm . . . i think the "distortion" is all yours mein herr
your stock response to my exposure of your mendacity is to whine that it is the "point of [your] post" (not the lie supporting it) that matters
fantastico!
and, please . . . instead of complaining like a lil biatch about "quote mining," do a rev and follow your "inclination" to its logical destination
it will probably prove less embarrassing for u going forward, arite?
Shitaan, even you won't shoot someone over a parking spot. Apparently they park in the visitor spots every once in a while. Does that mean one shot go to your private home and shoot you in the head? Complain to the property manager then the police. You don't go shooting people left and right execution style. If that man is not sent to jail for life some crazy person in jail will take him out.
Shitaan, even you won't shoot someone over a parking spot. Apparently they park in the visitor spots every once in a while. Does that mean one shot go to your private home and shoot you in the head? Complain to the property manager then the police. You don't go shooting people left and right execution style. If that man is not sent to jail for life some crazy person in jail will take him out.
My Dear Bruddaman,
I hope by now one can safely assume I wouldn't personally shoot someone over a parking spot (or any other reason). I walk away from those kinds of arguments. Not worth my time. Maybe when I was younger and more immature I might engage in silly arguments. But not now.
Don't go into straw man territory man. No one is arguing anyone should get shot over a parking spot or any other such trivial nonsense.
I'm pointing out that this is from all the accounts so far a parking space issue. It is not unfathomable that a human being can snap over a relatively trivial issue such as parking spaces. People get shot all the time over road rage issues and parking lot arguments. It's not a "norm" but it's also not unheard of.
How many of us have not had an unreasonable neighbor issue over parking, noise, or dogs that have not stretched the bounds of human toleration to the point where we may quit our reason?
And FYI, getting shot over parking spaces is far more "normal" than getting shot for being Muslim in America.
My Dear Friend,
If you must know, I do try to get out from under my rock as often as I can.
Permit me to draw a line between the ordinary criminality of individuals committed for individual purposes and individual gains. Our society can handle these individuals. If these individuals even happen to be "Muslim", even that doesn't matter. No one is concerned about Muslim "ordinary crime."
Yuh crazy bai. Crime is crime regardless of reason. In a court of law, anyone charged with breaking the law is tried to determine if they did break the law not why. The why may only come in during the penalty phrase after a conviction. Therefore there is no distinction whether the crime is motivated by hatred or any of the normal reasons you mentioned. This nonsense about Islam inspires Muslims to be violent was very eloquently addressed on social media recently when someone wrote 'There are about 1.7 billion Muslims in the world. If Islam really promoted terrorism, you'd all probably be dead by now'. So your fear is all in your head. I have a higher chance of being killed by one of your normal criminals than I do a terrorist. That is why I don't intend to lose any sleep over what perturbs you.
This guy is in college. The victims are in college. Yet they are fighting and killing over a parking space. One would think that that kind of behavior would be more suitable for the more astute RH regulars.