quote:

Originally posted by raymond:
Last time I read Rev predictions, he said Obama will lose to Hilary, then he said Obama will lose to Bush...

he gettin ready to go 0 for 3

Obama will win. The Republicans pretend they have an economic plan and it consists of less tax on the rich and less regulation, the same that got us in the fix

quote:

Originally posted by cain:
My crystal ball tells me it will be Obama for another four years.

cainster:

Your crystal ball clearly has a crack--go out and buy a new one.

Oh well, like the Rev mentioned above---I'll be following Obama's approval ratings---right now it's at 44%. That makes the O-man:



Rev

quote:

Originally posted by Rev Al:

quote:

Originally posted by SuperMike:
Obama will win hands down..i cannot wait to see the debate with him RUMNEE.

Mike:

Unless Obama is allowed to read from his beloved teleprompter during the debates, Romney will totally demolish him---compared to Mitt, Barack is a schnook and a birdbrain.


RE: OBAMA WINNING IN 2012

There is only one number the Rev is interested in---and will be following closely---Obama's performance approval rating.


Check this:

If Obama's approval rating is 50% or more come November he will win re-election; if not he will lose

IT'S THAT SIMPLE--a 50% or more approval rating and the American voters will give the O-man another 4 years.


Right now Obama's approval rating is 44%---see link:

gallup--Obama approval rating


HISTORICALLY:

According to gallup Presidents with approval numbers above 48 to 50% in the gallup poll win re-election. Those with approval ratings below that level lose.


RIGHT NOW OBAMA(44%) LOOKS LIKE A LOSER!


But November is 10 months way---allah may smile on Hussein.



In the name of allah, the beneficient, the merciful...In the name of the father, the son, and the holy spirit---may America be blessed with a president who is a problem solver in Nov 2012.

Rev

Rev Al !
I live on St.Maarten and I don't know where you live, but it seems that you are allowing yourself to be brainwashed by the lunatics. Obama has a war chest of one billion dollars , hence Romney will be crushed. Besides you don't want to accept reality after the Bush fiasco .
Even Laura Ingraham stated that Obama will crush Romney .

It would be good to see Obama go down in defeat. He spent his complete term destroying the interests of colored people in an effort to "Irish stew" favour with the right wing white majority. I hope he gets booted from Office the faster the better.

quote:

Originally posted by Rev Al:

In the name of allah, the beneficient, the merciful...In the name of the father, the son, and the holy spirit---may America be blessed with a president who is a problem solver in Nov 2012.

Rev

And his name is Barack Obama.

quote:

Originally posted by Kennys:
Rev Al !
I live on St.Maarten and I don't know where you live, but it seems that you are allowing yourself to be brainwashed by the lunatics. Obama has a war chest of one billion dollars , hence Romney will be crushed. Besides you don't want to accept reality after the Bush fiasco .
Even Laura Ingraham stated that Obama will crush Romney .

Kenny:

The Rev lives in the BIG APPLE---the most exciting city on the planet---NYC.

Listen Kenny--Obama can have a war chest of a trillion dollars---it wont help him---unless he gets his approval rating up to 50% he will be a one term president.


RE: OBAMA'S ONLY HOPE

If Obama can work his magical voodoo power again---and con the white people like he did in 2008---hypnotize and mesmerize them with his teleprompter speeches(44% of white Americans voted for Obama in 2008)---then he has a shot---his approval rating may raise to 50%---and if this is the case---he will win re-election.

OBAMA'S APPROVAL RATING TODAY = 44% = ONE TERM PRESIDENT

Rev

From the beginning the republicans were shocked that a one term BLACK SENATOR won the presidency. From that point forward they set out to destroy Obama come hell or high water. They basically are doing this to make sure that no black man or democrats regain power. At this point they don't care who suffer or lose. That is collateral damage and when the economy bounces back thru a republican president they will say "see we told you so. the Dems can't do this for you" and they will have another 20 years. Will Obama lose? That's left to be seen. If he wants to win he better time his Iran war properly because we know its coming, we just don't know when.

quote:

Originally posted by Rev Al:

quote:

Originally posted by Kennys:
Rev Al !
I live on St.Maarten and I don't know where you live, but it seems that you are allowing yourself to be brainwashed by the lunatics. Obama has a war chest of one billion dollars , hence Romney will be crushed. Besides you don't want to accept reality after the Bush fiasco .
Even Laura Ingraham stated that Obama will crush Romney .

Kenny:

The Rev lives in the BIG APPLE---the most exciting city on the planet---NYC.

Listen Kenny--Obama can have a war chest of a trillion dollars---it wont help him---unless he gets his approval rating up to 50% he will be a one term president.


RE: OBAMA'S ONLY HOPE

If Obama can work his magical voodoo power again---and con the white people like he did in 2008---hypnotize and mesmerize them with his teleprompter speeches(44% of white Americans voted for Obama in 2008)---then he has a shot---his approval rating may raise to 50%---and if this is the case---he will win re-election.

OBAMA'S APPROVAL RATING TODAY = 44% = ONE TERM PRESIDENT

Rev

You do not know a damn thing about the man. I have seen him a couple of times close up and listened to him on numerous occasions on his campaign stops. He is absolutely brilliant, quick witted, charming and the idea he has to con anyone is no more than emerge from your racist mind. No wonder you have to troll for those bigotted catch phrases like "voodooo" and "con".

He will eviscerate any of the prevailing candidates on head on meetings. Even eye of Newt would be flustered and forced into his sullen confusing rant about dubious histories that only he can comprehend

Poor Indo supremacist does not have clue about the importance of campaign funds. The only thing he knows how to do well is cut and paste from the internet.

quote:

Originally posted by FC:
Poor Indo supremacist does not have clue about the impotance of campaign funds.

There will be over 3 billion in this campaign and each side will have good war chests. Obama has the advantage since he cannot be maxed out as his support is from mainly small donors who can be repeats.

Corporate funding will be gone after this election as neither side can sustain the unaccountable, poisonous negative campaigning we are already seeing in the GOP.

quote:

Originally posted by yuji22:
Obama keeps blaming others for his failed economic policies.

What is this failed economic policy?

quote:

Originally posted by ksazma:

quote:

Originally posted by yuji22:
Obama keeps blaming others for his failed economic policies.

What is this failed economic policy?

You are talking to a racist dunce.

quote:

Originally posted by ksazma:

quote:

Originally posted by yuji22:
Obama keeps blaming others for his failed economic policies.

What is this failed economic policy?

You didn't have to Kaz, you didn't have to. This banna writes a bit like albert, it's probably that braniac albert that's posting as yujiji,same stupidness all day long and all wrong.

Mitt Romney won Florida by bombarding the airwaves with a lie about Newt of which he is fully aware. If people usually say that negative campaigning disgusts them, imagine how dispicable Romney is lying about Newt. His was not negative. It was dishonest. Romney looks like a rich spoiled kid trying to bully himself into the White House.

quote:

Originally posted by D2:

quote:

Originally posted by ksazma:

quote:

Originally posted by yuji22:
Obama keeps blaming others for his failed economic policies.

What is this failed economic policy?

You are talking to a racist dunce.

That opening post seems to be taken directly from Frank Lutz with no thinking from yuji22.

quote:

Originally posted by FC:
Poor Indo supremacist does not have clue about the impotance of campaign funds.

Poor FC!

He needs to learn how to spell---here's a present for you FC:



Rev

PS. Dont get riled up--it was only a typo--I see you corrected it.

quote:

Originally posted by cain:

quote:

Originally posted by ksazma:

quote:

Originally posted by yuji22:
Obama keeps blaming others for his failed economic policies.

What is this failed economic policy?

You didn't have to Kaz, you didn't have to. This banna writes a bit like albert, it's probably that braniac albert that's posting as yujiji,same stupidness all day long and all wrong.

I just want to see what he knows about this failed policy. Maybe he will explain.

quote:

Originally posted by ksazma:

quote:

Originally posted by D2:

quote:

Originally posted by ksazma:

quote:

Originally posted by yuji22:
Obama keeps blaming others for his failed economic policies.

What is this failed economic policy?

You are talking to a racist dunce.

That opening post seems to be taken directly from Frank Lutz with no thinking from yuji22 .

The "22" in his name is his IQ....that's what I heard.

quote:

Originally posted by cain:
The "22" in his name is his IQ....that's what I heard.

O rass!!! Dah high?

When you look into the numbers for campaign donations for the 4th quarter of 2011, not only did Obama raise more money than the Republican candidates but he also vastly outnumbered them especially Romney in number of people giving small donations. Since each person is only good for one vote and Obama's donors far outnumbered the Republicans all together, how would the Republican candidate come up with enough single votes to surpass Obama?

If this tepid recovery continues to take hold albeit it is the slowest since the great depresion Obama's approval rating should improve.

quote:

Originally posted by ksazma:
Mitt Romney won Florida by bombarding the airwaves with a lie about Newt of which he is fully aware. If people usually say that negative campaigning disgusts them, imagine how dispicable Romney is lying about Newt. His was not negative. It was dishonest. Romney looks like a rich spoiled kid trying to bully himself into the White House.

Got to give him his props. He has not worked for the past 2 years and yet made 41 million dollars. While he paid 15% tax ( no fault of his) he give the same away, albeit to his church so they can ensure the faithful gets a space ship ride to spend eternity on the planet Kolob.

quote:

Originally posted by ksazma:
Mitt Romney won Florida by bombarding the airwaves with a lie about Newt of which he is fully aware.

ksazma:

Newt is just an erratic, egomanaical huckster---he is no leader---he is a huckster--he peddles polical influence---Fannie paid him 1.6 million---Romney, a man of proven leadership, had to carpet bomb Newt in Florida with negatives---it worked---Romney won the FL primary.


RE: OBAMA

Obama's current approval rating is 44%.

It will take a miracle for him to get his approval number up to 50% by November---right now the O-man looks like a one termer.

Rev

quote:

Originally posted by D2:

quote:

Originally posted by ksazma:
Mitt Romney won Florida by bombarding the airwaves with a lie about Newt of which he is fully aware. If people usually say that negative campaigning disgusts them, imagine how dispicable Romney is lying about Newt. His was not negative. It was dishonest. Romney looks like a rich spoiled kid trying to bully himself into the White House.

Got to give him his props. He has not worked for the past 2 years and yet made 41 million dollars. While he paid 15% tax ( no fault of his) he give the same away, albeit to his church so they can ensure the faithful gets a space ship ride to spend eternity on the planet Kolob.

And I don't have a problem with his ability to make money or his effective tax rate. I don't have a problem with him wanting to be president either. But he knew that Newt was cleared of those curruption charges and should have found another to win the state.

quote:

Originally posted by Rev Al:

quote:

Originally posted by ksazma:
Mitt Romney won Florida by bombarding the airwaves with a lie about Newt of which he is fully aware.

ksazma:

Newt is just an erratic, egomanaical huckster---he is no leader---he is a huckster--he peddles polical influence---Fannie paid him 1.6 million---Romney, a man of proven leadership, had to carpet bomb Newt in Florida with negatives---it worked---Romney won the FL primary.


RE: OBAMA

Obama's current approval rating is 44%.

It will take a miracle for him to get his approval number up to 50% by November---right now the O-man looks like a one termer.

Rev

Perhaps you should have read my entire post. He did not use negative ads. His ads were dishonest. Obama doesn't need 50% approval to win in November.

quote:

Originally posted by Rev Al:

quote:

Originally posted by ksazma:
Mitt Romney won Florida by bombarding the airwaves with a lie about Newt of which he is fully aware.

ksazma:

Newt is just an erratic, egomanaical huckster---he is no leader---he is a huckster--he peddles polical influence---Fannie paid him 1.6 million---Romney, a man of proven leadership, had to carpet bomb Newt in Florida with negatives---it worked---Romney won the FL primary.


RE: OBAMA

Obama's current approval rating is 44%.

It will take a miracle for him to get his approval number up to 50% by November---right now the O-man looks like a one termer.

Rev

I can assure you he is in no way worried as the path to victory is being paved by the GOP candidates who are canalizing their party hopes. Further, the idea that they have an economic theory to success is a farce. It is a recycling of the same old garbage of low taxes on the rich and a gutting of out regulatory body to facilitate the kinds of riskyh behavior that created the housing meltdown.

Obama, has a social agenda and that is being coupled with an economic theory that is evolving on its own as americans are working smarter and economically in their endeavors. Many of the companies that fabricate high tech abroad are coming home as costs are lower and quality will not be problematic as it has become. Further, Americans are incensed at the labor habits of China, India and places like Vietnam and Thailand.

Regardless of the doomsayers it is not simply ability to make stuff cheaply that is the keystone to economic prosperity. It is the ambiance of the society that the people can decide for themselves what is it they want. Just look and see what is being worn or driven etc the world over and you will see that the designs came from the streets of NY and LA and Philly etc and the minds of research centers in the US.

Obama has not only a good chance but the best chance. Guyanese Indians may not vote for him but Latins from LA to Florida to Nevada and Arizona are voting en-mass for him

quote:

Originally posted by Rev Al:

quote:

Originally posted by FC:
Poor Indo supremacist does not have clue about the impotance of campaign funds.

Poor FC!

He needs to learn how to spell---here's a present for you FC:



Rev

PS. Dont get riled up--it was only a typo--I see you corrected it.

FC attended classes at UG lectured by Freddie. His buddy Obama is in deep trouble, he cannot be re-elected.

Most presidents only have to repaint the house when they move in. When Obama reached the house, he found it completely consumed by fire. He first had to put out the fire, clean up the debris and then rebuild the house.

quote:

Originally posted by FC:
If this tepid recovery continues to take hold albeit it is the slowest since the great depresion Obama's approval rating should improve.

FC:

Keep dreaming youngman---that's a big "IF"---"if this recovery continues..."


THE NUMBERS DON'T LIE!

Right now Obama's approval rating is 44%---it will take a miracle to get it up to 50% by election day.

Did you see the CBO report yeaterday ? Read just one line:

"...the national debt, currently pushing $16 trillion, would explode to $21.6 trillion in less than 10 years."




HOPEFULLY THE WHITE PEOPLE IN AMERICA(44% voted for Obama in 2008) WAKE UP FROM THEIR OBAMA INDUCED TRANCE AND VOTE THIS FAILURE OUT OF OFFICE.

Rev

quote:

Originally posted by ksazma:
Obama doesn't need 50% approval to win in November.

Well ksazma:

You may be correct--George Bush was re-elected in 2004 with an approval rating of 49%---every other president who was re-elected had a 50+% approval rating.

Now ksazma, how does Obama get to the 48-50% range from his current 44% ?

ONLY VOODOO CAN SAVE THE O-MAN In 2012---he has to con those dumb white Americans again---44% voted for him in 2008.

Rev

quote:

Originally posted by Rev Al:

quote:

Originally posted by ksazma:
Obama doesn't need 50% approval to win in November.

Well ksazma:

You may be correct--George Bush was re-elected in 2004 with an approval rating of 49%---every other president who was re-elected had a 50+% approval rating.

Now ksazma, how does Obama get to the 48-50% range from his current 44% ?

ONLY VOODOO CAN SAVE THE O-MAN In 2012---he has to con those dumb white Americans again---44% voted for him in 2008.

Rev

First of all he did not con anyone. The choice was between him and McCain. Likewise the choice this time would be between him and a GOP candidate and it looks like the Republicans are still looking for a Republican they can feel comfortable voting for.

quote:

Originally posted by ksazma:

quote:

Originally posted by Rev Al:

quote:

Originally posted by ksazma:
Obama doesn't need 50% approval to win in November.

Well ksazma:

You may be correct--George Bush was re-elected in 2004 with an approval rating of 49%---every other president who was re-elected had a 50+% approval rating.

Now ksazma, how does Obama get to the 48-50% range from his current 44% ?

ONLY VOODOO CAN SAVE THE O-MAN In 2012---he has to con those dumb white Americans again---44% voted for him in 2008.

Rev

First of all he did not con anyone. The choice was between him and McCain. Likewise the choice this time would be between him and a GOP candidate and it looks like the Republicans are still looking for a Republican they can feel comfortable voting for.

Ksazma, Republicans always rally behind their leaders. A leadership convention is about selecting a leader elected by their choice.

Unlike Democrats who denied Hillary her votes from one state and propped up Obama to win the nomination.

The Hillary factor is now haunting Democrats. They denied the first woman the nomination in favour of the first black president and look at the mess that he has left the USA in today.

"Obama must go." "Americans cannot stand him no mo"

quote:

Originally posted by yuji22:

quote:

Originally posted by ksazma:

quote:

Originally posted by Rev Al:

quote:

Originally posted by ksazma:
Obama doesn't need 50% approval to win in November.

Well ksazma:

You may be correct--George Bush was re-elected in 2004 with an approval rating of 49%---every other president who was re-elected had a 50+% approval rating.

Now ksazma, how does Obama get to the 48-50% range from his current 44% ?

ONLY VOODOO CAN SAVE THE O-MAN In 2012---he has to con those dumb white Americans again---44% voted for him in 2008.

Rev

First of all he did not con anyone. The choice was between him and McCain. Likewise the choice this time would be between him and a GOP candidate and it looks like the Republicans are still looking for a Republican they can feel comfortable voting for.

Ksazma, Republicans always rally behind their leaders. A leadership convention is about selecting a leader elected by their choice.

Unlike Democrats who denied Hillary her votes from one state and propped up Obama to win the nomination.

The Hillary factor is now haunting Democrats. They denied the first woman the nomination in favour of the first black president and look at the mess that he has left the USA in today.

"Obama must go." "Americans cannot stand him no mo"

You are such a pathetically mentally misshapen creature. You cannot have been nurtured much in the company of thinkers. Democrats have a similar convention practice as Republicans and like Republicans, democrats gravitate to the leader of their choice.

Further, democrats voted for Hillary. She just got fewer democrats than Obama.

Bush give us 5 trillion in debt. The 2009 budget year began in the Bush era. Obama began his term with the Bush crash and when something is on the ground it takes time to get it upright again especial if those who pushed it down are not helping to lift it up.

quote:

Originally posted by D2:

quote:

Originally posted by yuji22:

quote:

Originally posted by ksazma:

quote:

Originally posted by Rev Al:

quote:

Originally posted by ksazma:
Obama doesn't need 50% approval to win in November.

Well ksazma:

You may be correct--George Bush was re-elected in 2004 with an approval rating of 49%---every other president who was re-elected had a 50+% approval rating.

Now ksazma, how does Obama get to the 48-50% range from his current 44% ?

ONLY VOODOO CAN SAVE THE O-MAN In 2012---he has to con those dumb white Americans again---44% voted for him in 2008.

Rev

First of all he did not con anyone. The choice was between him and McCain. Likewise the choice this time would be between him and a GOP candidate and it looks like the Republicans are still looking for a Republican they can feel comfortable voting for.

Ksazma, Republicans always rally behind their leaders. A leadership convention is about selecting a leader elected by their choice.

Unlike Democrats who denied Hillary her votes from one state and propped up Obama to win the nomination.

The Hillary factor is now haunting Democrats. They denied the first woman the nomination in favour of the first black president and look at the mess that he has left the USA in today.

"Obama must go." "Americans cannot stand him no mo"

You are such a pathetically mentally misshapen creature. You cannot have been nurtured much in the company of thinkers. Democrats have a similar convention practice as Republicans and like Republicans, democrats gravitate to the leader of their choice.

Further, democrats voted for Hillary. She just got fewer democrats than Obama.

D2 take a look here:

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/po.../05/clinton-demands/


Democrats denied votes that Hillary won. I guess you did not study history.

quote:

Originally posted by ABIDHA:
Gentlemen, American politics is not Guyana politics. When a presidential candidate wins he becomes the nation's president and leader of the free world. Guyana, on the other hand, we have two neemakaram, hungry belly party name APNU & AFC. They are trying to be democratic and civilized but those two words are not in their psyche, and they don't know the meaning. Then you have overseas neemakaram ah praise them. Everywhere you tun is neemakarams.

Excellent!

quote:

Originally posted by Henry:
Not necessarily. The US went through a similar period of economic insanity during the early 20th Century, and recovered thanks to the leadership of FDR, who restored an American approach to economics. However... imagine how bad things could have gone if instead of FDR, there had been a Wall Street-loving pro-British neo-Confederate type of Democratic president, like Obama. Under those circumstances, the US would have gone in the same direction that most of Europe did.

The factors were different then back in FDR's time. Today other nations have access to the same or even better technology and cheaper labor. To produce an item in the US is exponentially more expensive due to such factors as high wages, EPA regulations, healthcare and so on. China can produce items at slave labor prices and dump the chemicals in the sewer without fines.

quote:

Originally posted by yuji22:


D2 take a look here:

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/po.../05/clinton-demands/


Democrats denied votes that Hillary won. I guess you did not study history.

You may be able to read history but your understanding and braggadocio as to competency at it is akin to that of Newt Gingrich.

Michigan was not count since they broke party rules in pushing their primary forward. Florida did the same and was similarly disqualified. Mrs Clinton knew the rules but that was her straw in a drowning campaign.

Obama did not make the rules. The DNC who made the rules was composed of people more favorable to her cause than Obama's.

quote:

Originally posted by D2:

quote:

Originally posted by yuji22:


D2 take a look here:

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/po.../05/clinton-demands/


Democrats denied votes that Hillary won. I guess you did not study history.

You may be able to read history but your understanding and braggadocio as to competency at it is akin to that of Newt Gingrich.

Michigan was not count since they broke party rules in pushing their primary forward. Florida did the same and was similarly disqualified. Mrs Clinton knew the rules but that was her straw in a drowning campaign.

Obama did not make the rules. The DNC who made the rules was composed of people more favorable to her cause than Obama's.

Dem bin waan da blackman win, datts wy. Dem gatt lil PNC wayzz.

quote:

Originally posted by D2:
You do not know a damn thing about the man(Barack Hussein Obama). I have seen him a couple of times close up and listened to him on numerous occasions on his campaign stops. He is absolutely brilliant, quick witted, charming and the idea he has to con anyone is no more than emerge from your racist mind. No wonder you have to troll for those bigotted catch phrases like "voodooo" and "con".

He will eviscerate any of the prevailing candidates on head on meetings. Even eye of Newt would be flustered and forced into his sullen confusing rant about dubious histories that only he can comprehend

D2:

THE NUMBERS DON'T LIE MY BWOY!

BARACK HUSSEIN'S CURRENT APPROVAL RATING IS 44%

What that 44% says is right now Hussein is a ONE TERMER.

Check this out D2:





Obama's voodoo will not con and dupe 44% of white Americans in 2012---maybe 35-39% will be conned and duped----those are the dumb stupid white people---but in the end Obama will not get as much white support as he got in 2008.

1.20.2013 WILL BE HIS LAST DAY---good riddance to that failure.

Rev

quote:

Originally posted by Rev Al:

quote:

Originally posted by FC:
If this tepid recovery continues to take hold albeit it is the slowest since the great depresion Obama's approval rating should improve.

FC:

Keep dreaming youngman---that's a big "IF"---"if this recovery continues..."


THE NUMBERS DON'T LIE!

Right now Obama's approval rating is 44%---it will take a miracle to get it up to 50% by election day.

Did you see the CBO report yeaterday ? Read just one line:

"...the national debt, currently pushing $16 trillion, would explode to $21.6 trillion in less than 10 years."




HOPEFULLY THE WHITE PEOPLE IN AMERICA(44% voted for Obama in 2008) WAKE UP FROM THEIR OBAMA INDUCED TRANCE AND VOTE THIS FAILURE OUT OF OFFICE.

Rev

You are caught in a time warp. You must have grown up in the sixties in Guyana. Your posts are symptomatic of race based thinking. Luckily I was spared that as I am from a younger generation where we don't judge people by the colour of their skin or their ethnicity. I think you are using Guyanese politics as the frame of reference where race plays a major part in deciding who to vote for. Get your race based trash out of here.