Skip to main content

PNC just hired a PR firm to influence US policy  They also want to initiate audits of SOPs of certain regions.  My understanding, only PPP and Coalition had reps at all polling stations.  So what are the challenging, themselves?  Also, nine regions have been verified.  So, are the planning to take back what they agreed to?  This is even more stupid than the 33/34 argument!

FM

PRESS STATEMENT

The statement made by the APNU+AFC Coalition’s David Granger is unsurprisingly typical of what Guyanese have come to expect from him – claims about upholding the rule of law, when the Judiciary has found him in violation of the Constitution and laws more times than any other President in the history of Guyana; and attempts to cast blame on the People’s Progressive Party (PPP).

The PPP wishes to stress that this is one time Mr. Granger will not be able to escape accountability. The events of last week occurred in full view of Guyanese; members of the diplomatic community; and international observers from the European Union, the Commonwealth, Organization of American States, CARICOM and the Carter Center.
It was Mr. Granger who embraced a fraudulent declaration from the Region 4 Returning Officer. It was Mr. Granger who claimed victory even before the Guyana Elections Commission (GECOM) made a final declaration. It was Mr. Granger who was in a haste to have himself sworn in as President.

Thankfully, social media, the vigilance of political parties and the presence of local and international observers, as well as members of the local diplomatic corps, made clear the facts of what took place at the GECOM Command Center, on High and Hadfield Streets. No attempt by Mr. Granger to whitewash what occurred will succeed.
While, Mr. Granger tries to cast blame on the PPP for what he calls an “interruption” of GECOM’s work, the fact of the matter is that the verification process was running smoothly and hundreds of Statements of Poll were verified, before a spreadsheet, with substantial variations in favour of the Coalition, was introduced into the process.
What Mr. Granger calls an interruption of the work of GECOM was, in fact, vociferous protests by all the political parties - all of which called for the use of the spreadsheet to be discontinued and for there to be a return to verification of results for Region 4 using the Statements of Poll, as is required by law. It is public knowledge that the Chief Elections Officer, only after vocal protests, assured all the political parties – in the presence of the international observers and members of the diplomatic corps – that the verification process would recommence and be completed, in accordance with the law, using the Statements of Poll. The process recommenced and was going well, until the Chair of GECOM stopped it on the basis of ‘compassionate’ grounds for GECOM staffers. It is also public knowledge that within hours thereafter, without resuming the verification process, a fraudulent declaration was made by the Region 4 Returning Officer.

The only party guilty of a falsification of reality is the one Mr. Granger leads.

Instead of peddling rhetoric, Mr. Granger should answer the Guyanese people on a few critical questions:
1. Why is the signature of Volda Lawrence, the Chairperson of his party, the PNCR, affixed to the declaration of the Region 4 Returning Officer, when the declarations of the other 9 Regions only have the stamp and signature of the Returning Officers of those areas?

2. Why was Amna Ally, the General Secretary of his party, the PNCR, visiting the GECOM Chairperson at her home, when the Chair is unavailable to her international advisors, members of the international election observer missions and the political parties?

3. Why was the GECOM lawyer, Neil Boston, being openly assisted by Roysdale Forde and Darren Wade, two APNU+AFC candidates?

4. Why was the Region 4 Returning Officer, Clairmont Mingo, after he made the fraudulent declaration, escorted from the GECOM Command Center by six ranks of the Guyana Police Force, and has not been seen or available to any stakeholders in the electoral process, since?

5. Why did his former Foreign Affairs Minister, Karen Cummings, threaten to revoke the accreditation of members of the international Election Observer Missions?

6. Why are his other former Ministers, Cathy Hughes and others, peddling falsehoods about Russians hacking into our electoral system, when that system is a manual system?

7. Why the fear about returning to verification of the election results Statement of Poll by Statement of Poll, and/or a recount, if there is such confidence in an electoral victory?

Why should, we the people of Guyana, believe Granger and his cronies when the world – the international election observers, individual countries, all the political parties, among other stakeholders – have said that the declaration of results for Region 4 is fraudulent? Why are Mr. Granger and his cronies the only ones standing on the other side? Who should be believed?

The People’s Progressive Party maintains that there be must a return to the process of verifying the results of the March 2, 2020 General and Regional Elections for Region 4, using the Statements of Polls, as required by law, and/or a recount of the ballots cast. This is the only process that will deliver free and fair elections and ensure that the will of the Guyanese people is not subverted.

People’s Progressive Party

March 9, 2020

 
FM

Bai Django, spreadsheets were not used in the other nine regions and it was not being used in region 4 for the first three hundred and something SOPs. I think you are twisting the circumstances. It wasn't Jagdeo who was nervous about the direction of the votes, it was Mingo hence his sudden illness followed by the CO's shenanigans and the other person suddenly was tired. Then suddenly Mingo went missing along with Lowenfield and Singh. Then this showed up. Vulga Vulva's signature on the official GECOM form. Is she a GECOM official?

Attachments

Images (1)
  • mceclip0
FM

David Granger is either a liar or is deluding himself ... he has breached the Constitution and Laws of Guyana many times and the CCJ has ruled that he did. How can he still come and say that he has acted in accordance with the Constitution and Laws of Guyana at all times?

Image may contain: possible text that says 'Brigadier David Granger hr STATEMENT BY HIS EXCELLENCY DAVID GRANGER PRESIDENT THE COOPERATIVE REPUBLIC OF GUYANA MARCH 2020 Guyanese, acknowledge that, one week after General and Regional Elections were held, we have yet had final declaration of results uncertainty and unease have arisen. assure the nation that, at all times, have acted in accordance with the Constitution and Laws of Guyana. After the elections on March 2nd, the nation awaited the declaration of the results by the Elections Commission after completing its work.'

Image may contain: text

No photo description available.

Attachments

Images (1)
  • mceclip0
FM
Last edited by Former Member

FORM 24 IS A GECOM PROPERTY - SINCE WHEN VOLDA WORKING AT GECOM. 

The other 9 Region  had only RO signature  and no one else. only Region 4 forms had a add signature. Where did this form came from and why did you and your COHORTS refused a verification for region 4--- why was it stop. 

Run Run like a coward 

Attachments

Images (1)
  • mceclip0
FM
Last edited by Former Member

Are you for real, ayo have no shame. The verification of the votes for Region 4 was stop by your people .. why? If APNU was  confident of winning the election, then they will continue the process of verification.  PPP is on record as saying, what ever results the verification shows they will respect. 

Why should we have a court challenge to produce the result?

Attachments

Images (1)
  • mceclip0
FM

Counting Agent, Assistant Agent, Polling Agent

Laws of Guyana

REPRESENTATION OF THE PEOPLE ACT

CHAPTER 1:03

Source -- http://guyaneselawyer.com/laws...yana/Laws/cap103.pdf

23.(1) The representative of each list of candidates shall not later than the 32nd day before election day give notice in writing to the Chief Election Officer appointing himself or some other person to be the election agent of the candidates in the list and if the appointment of an election agent is revoked or the election agent dies and no further appointment is made, the representative of the list of candidates shall be deemed to have been appointed to be the election agent of the candidates.

(2) The Chief Election Officer shall cause a notice to be published in the Gazette of the name and address of the person appointed or deemed to be appointed as election agent.

24.(1) An election agent may appoint—

(a) an assistant agent for each district;

(b) a counting agent for each district;

(c) a polling agent for each polling place.

(2) Notice in writing of every appointment of an assistant agent, counting agent and polling agent, stating the name and address of the person appointed shall be given not later than the 7th day before election day by the election agent to the returning officer of the district for which the assistant agent or counting agent is appointed or in which is situate the polling place for which the polling agent is appointed.

(3) The returning officer shall upon receiving a notice of an appointment of an assistant agent give public notice of the name and address of the person appointed.

(4) There shall not be, at the same time, more than one assistant agent or more than one counting agent of a group of candidates for anyone district nor shall there be more than one polling agent of that group for any one polling place.

(5) Upon the revocation of the appointment of or upon the death of an assistant agent, counting agent or polling agent the election agent shall forthwith give notice in writing thereof to the returning officer to whom notice of appointment was given and shall give notice in writing of any further appointment made in accordance with subsection (2):

   Provided that the appointment of an assistant agent, counting agen tor polling agent shall not be vacated solely by reason of the revocation of the appointment or the death of the election agent who appointed him.

(6)Nothing in this section shall preclude the appointment of a person as an assistant agent for two or more districts or as polling agent for two or more polling places or as both assistant agent and counting agent, or as both assistant agent and polling agent, or as both counting agent and polling agent, or as assistant agent, counting agent and polling agent.

FM

FORM 24

THE REPRESENTATION OF THE PEOPLE ACT

GENERAL ELECTIONS

ELECTION RETURN

for the Polling District of ................

1. Number of valid votes cast for each list of candidates

List of ....................................   total ................................. votes

List of ...................................    total ................................. votes

List of ...................................    total ................................ votes

List of ...................................    total ................................ votes

List of ...................................    total ................................ votes

List of ...................................    total ................................. votes

          ________________________

2.Total valid votes for alllists

3.ADD total number of rejected ballot papers (see statement below)

4.Grand total number of persons who appear to have voted

5.Total number of spoilt Ballot Papers .................................

6.Total number of Tendered Ballot Papers used ..................

7.Statement of Rejected Ballot Papers in the Polling District.....

Number of ballot papers rejected for—

(a) want of official mark .......................................................

(b) unmarked or void for uncertainty .....................................

(c) marked for more than one candidates’ list ..........................

(d) marked so that the elector can be identified ......................

          __________________

Total          __________________

          ........................................

          Returning Officer

          Date.......................................

 

Laws of Guyana

REPRESENTATION OF THE PEOPLE ACT

CHAPTER 1:03

Source -- http://guyaneselawyer.com/laws...yana/Laws/cap103.pdf

FM
Last edited by Former Member

Here is my take. My theory of what happened.

APNU/AFC was of the honest view that with the count of Regions 1-9, the PPPC would not have had enough lead to overtake the lead APNU/AFC would have in Region 4. This started out as their honest opinion. They thought that the people loved them so much and they would increase their votes substantially compared to 2015 Elections.

Gecom therefore went along merrily to count Regions 1-9 perfectly and then realised PPPC had obtained 52,000 votes in the lead. This lead was highly unexpected. It shocked them.
Upon checking their SOPs, APNU/AFC realised that they could not overtake the PPPC lead of 52,000.

APNU/AFC, as they were checking Region 4 results in presence of the Observers, realised that they had instead lost ground in Region 4 as people did not vote for them in the volume as they thought and the lead of the PPPC could not be overtaken. They checked their SOPs and that also confirmed they could not overtake PPPC lead.

They therefore had to live with the fact that Regions 1-9 were already counted in the presence of the Observers and showed PPPC had 52,000 votes in the lead. They could not now change that lead. So they had to activate PLAN B in collusion and connivance with GECOM.

PLAN B
So how do they remain in government when there was an obvious defeat? They with the collusion of Gecom, stopped the verification process, chased out the Observers, got the RO to fudge/ invent the numbers and declare the winner.

That's my theory. Maybe it was different. But whatever theory it is, the intent was to retain power at all costs even by fraud.

You know they planned but GOD is the best of planners

AND SO I REST MY CASE AND YOU BE THE JUDGE.

FM
×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×