Skip to main content

Originally Posted by caribny:
Originally Posted by KishanB:

.

This is what Granja has to apologise for, not for himself but for his party that denied Guyana Walter Rodney.

 

 

And when can we expect the PPP to apologize for its own role in creating Guyana's problems?  You do know that the PPP was very upset when Rodney began talking to sugar workers.  In their opinion Rodney was to take away black support from the PNC, but to leave their Indian supporters alone.

 

So where was the PPP in creating cross ethnic alliances?

 

Why should it be only the PNC (black people) who should apologize?

kARI started this thread about the PNC. We will deal with the PPP, as far as I am concerned they need to do more than apologizing, some of them ought to be in jail.

 

Race has certainly blind some of you. How the hell an apology by the PNC is apology from blacks to Indians?

Chief

Had a nice day in Brooklyn earlier and returned to a lost of contributions but basically more of the same. I haven't seen much original thought, except those of Kzaz and Chief, and KishanB. Jalil made a good point about the PPP missing a golden opportunity to reach out to Nagamootoo prior to the last elections, which I know is anathema to Jagdeo.

 

I'm heartened that there were no cuss-downs - thank Nehru for not making this important thread one to get the Admin's attention and thus the padlock was kept in their pockets (I must say I laughed at the post about the thread's IQ dropping 20% when Nehru made his first comment ).

 

Redux - I know that you can separate reality from passion. The thesis advanced is what does it take to change Guyana's governance by removing the PPP from power or forcing them to change, and the key advanced (no, not the AFC's key) is for the majority electorate body - the Indians - to lose the mistrust of the PNC. And how? The new PNC must divorce itself from the PNC period. You take umbrage with this as only the PNC must apologize and that we are not holding the PPP culpable. that's the whole point - we don't care about the PPP, we want them to lose, so why ask them to apologuize? They hold the upper hand. Samje? Reality!!!

 

Nehru, you also make the assertion that once a thug always a thug. Any allusion on my part that this is not your daddy's PNC draws the incorrect inference that I do not know slo-fiah, mo-fiah will emerge. I ask you to look at the reality of protests in Guyana in this day and age and see if that incentive still holds.

 

CaribJ, I see the same trait in Redux to unravel reality from passion. What about the PPP's electoral dominance escapes you? What about a blueprint that says pull the Indian vote away from the PPP and the combined opposition will force the PPP out is alien to your thinking? Why do you conjoin this tactic with an inference that I want to make Indians comfortable and giving the PPP a pass. You and Redux are the ones giving this PPP party a pass. Think about it. Chief says the same thing. Kzaz says the PNC cannot win by some fictitious street protest. Get into this century friend.

Kari
Originally Posted by redux:
Originally Posted by Chief:
 . . . Granger cannot want to head of the PNC and say it was okay to use the army to murder people just to steal an election.

chief, u are a big man . . . there is no need for the cheap lie to make a lameass point

 

no damn different than baseman and his sick nonsense about PNC "enslaving" Indo-Guyanese

 

y'all something else . . .

Its' on record my friend.

Chief
Originally Posted by Kari:

Had a nice day in Brooklyn earlier and returned to a lost of contributions but basically more of the same. I haven't seen much original thought, except those of Kzaz and Chief, and KishanB. Jalil made a good point about the PPP missing a golden opportunity to reach out to Nagamootoo prior to the last elections, which I know is anathema to Jagdeo.

 

I'm heartened that there were no cuss-downs - thank Nehru for not making this important thread one to get the Admin's attention and thus the padlock was kept in their pockets (I must say I laughed at the post about the thread's IQ dropping 20% when Nehru made his first comment ).

 

Redux - I know that you can separate reality from passion. The thesis advanced is what does it take to change Guyana's governance by removing the PPP from power or forcing them to change, and the key advanced (no, not the AFC's key) is for the majority electorate body - the Indians - to lose the mistrust of the PNC. And how? The new PNC must divorce itself from the PNC period. You take umbrage with this as only the PNC must apologize and that we are not holding the PPP culpable. that's the whole point - we don't care about the PPP, we want them to lose, so why ask them to apologuize? They hold the upper hand. Samje? Reality!!!

 

Nehru, you also make the assertion that once a thug always a thug. Any allusion on my part that this is not your daddy's PNC draws the incorrect inference that I do not know slo-fiah, mo-fiah will emerge. I ask you to look at the reality of protests in Guyana in this day and age and see if that incentive still holds.

 

CaribJ, I see the same trait in Redux to unravel reality from passion. What about the PPP's electoral dominance escapes you? What about a blueprint that says pull the Indian vote away from the PPP and the combined opposition will force the PPP out is alien to your thinking? Why do you conjoin this tactic with an inference that I want to make Indians comfortable and giving the PPP a pass. You and Redux are the ones giving this PPP party a pass. Think about it. Chief says the same thing. Kzaz says the PNC cannot win by some fictitious street protest. Get into this century friend.

dude, when u want a proper response from me  . . . address me and my ideas directly

 

don't hide behind plenty useless, google psychology, ad hominen [same ol, same ol . . .] verbiage and conflation as a form of guerrilla 'warfare'

 

like chief and the lies . . . it's cowardly

FM
Last edited by Former Member
Originally Posted by redux:

chief, it's ok if u find it convenient to conflate me with caribny to further your lameass polemic

 

what i will NOT let u do unchallenged is to LIE thru your teeth to further your retrograde tribal agenda masquerading as support for inclusiveness and democracy

 

in my previous post, i asked 'why the lie'? . . . you've run away like a bloody coward

Chief never run I am reading from the top coming down.

Chief
Originally Posted by Chief:
Originally Posted by redux:
Originally Posted by Chief:
 . . . Granger cannot want to head of the PNC and say it was okay to use the army to murder people just to steal an election.

chief, u are a big man . . . there is no need for the cheap lie to make a lameass point

 

no damn different than baseman and his sick nonsense about PNC "enslaving" Indo-Guyanese

 

y'all something else . . .

Its' on record my friend.

That is a LIE!!. . . what "record?!

 

as a big man, u ought to be ashamed of yourself

FM
Originally Posted by Chief:
Originally Posted by redux:

That is a LIE!!. . . what "record?!

 

as a big man, u ought to be ashamed of yourself

Yo hold your horses, STOP THE PERSONAL ABUSE.

Why are you behaving in such disgusting manner?

 

Granger is on record saying that there is nothing to apologize for the GDF actions during the 1973 elections.

he NEVER said what u said he said . . . LIAR!

FM
Originally Posted by redux:
Originally Posted by Chief:
Originally Posted by redux:

That is a LIE!!. . . what "record?!

 

as a big man, u ought to be ashamed of yourself

Yo hold your horses, STOP THE PERSONAL ABUSE.

Why are you behaving in such disgusting manner?

 

Granger is on record saying that there is nothing to apologize for the GDF actions during the 1973 elections.

he NEVER said what u said he said . . . LIAR!

Chief
Originally Posted by redux:
Originally Posted by ksazma:
Originally Posted by redux:
 

he NEVER said what u said he said . . . LIAR!

What did he say?

ask chief . . . he is the one who posted the lie then attempted to change his mouth when i called him on it

 

if u know . . . BRING the bloody quote!

If I wanted to ask Chief, I wouldn't need you to suggest it.

FM
Originally Posted by ksazma:
Originally Posted by redux:
Originally Posted by ksazma:
Originally Posted by redux:
 

he NEVER said what u said he said . . . LIAR!

What did he say?

ask chief . . . he is the one who posted the lie then attempted to change his mouth when i called him on it

 

if u know . . . BRING the bloody quote!

If I wanted to ask Chief, I wouldn't need you to suggest it.

that's your problem, not mine

FM
Originally Posted by redux:
Originally Posted by ksazma:
Originally Posted by redux:
Originally Posted by ksazma:
Originally Posted by redux:
 

he NEVER said what u said he said . . . LIAR!

What did he say?

ask chief . . . he is the one who posted the lie then attempted to change his mouth when i called him on it

 

if u know . . . BRING the bloody quote!

If I wanted to ask Chief, I wouldn't need you to suggest it.

that's your problem, not mine

Whatever comforts you.

FM
Originally Posted by ksazma:
Originally Posted by redux:
Originally Posted by ksazma:
Originally Posted by redux:
Originally Posted by ksazma:
Originally Posted by redux:
 

he NEVER said what u said he said . . . LIAR!

What did he say?

ask chief . . . he is the one who posted the lie then attempted to change his mouth when i called him on it

 

if u know . . . BRING the bloody quote!

If I wanted to ask Chief, I wouldn't need you to suggest it.

that's your problem, not mine

Whatever comforts you.

uh uh . . . yaaaaaaaaaaaaaaawwwwwn

FM
Originally Posted by redux:
Originally Posted by Kari:
-----------------------

Redux - I know that you can separate reality from passion. The thesis advanced is what does it take to change Guyana's governance by removing the PPP from power or forcing them to change, and the key advanced (no, not the AFC's key) is for the majority electorate body - the Indians - to lose the mistrust of the PNC. And how? The new PNC must divorce itself from the PNC period. You take umbrage with this as only the PNC must apologize and that we are not holding the PPP culpable. that's the whole point - we don't care about the PPP, we want them to lose, so why ask them to apologuize? They hold the upper hand. Samje? Reality!!!

 

-----------------------

 

CaribJ, I see the same trait in Redux to unravel reality from passion. What about the PPP's electoral dominance escapes you? What about a blueprint that says pull the Indian vote away from the PPP and the combined opposition will force the PPP out is alien to your thinking? Why do you conjoin this tactic with an inference that I want to make Indians comfortable and giving the PPP a pass. You and Redux are the ones giving this PPP party a pass. Think about it. Chief says the same thing. Kzaz says the PNC cannot win by some fictitious street protest. Get into this century friend.

dude, when u want a proper response from me  . . . address me and my ideas directly

 

don't hide behind plenty useless, google psychology, ad hominen [same ol, same ol . . .] verbiage and conflation as a form of guerrilla 'warfare'

 

like chief and the lies . . . it's cowardly

....address me and my ideas directly

 

??????????????

 

don't hide behind plenty useless, google psychology, ad hominen [same ol, same ol . . .] verbiage and conflation as a form of guerrilla 'warfare'

 

like chief and the lies

 

?????????????????

 

 

Hey Stormy, you have competition in the most inane posts on GNI

Kari
Originally Posted by Chief:
.

What you are saying is not news to me neither Kari. When we are speaking about  ways how the PNC can reform both you and Redux take it as offence  and we have Indians at heart. If the PNC DO NOT REFORM OR AT LEAST ADMIT TO THEIR FAULTS THEN IT WILL BE DIFFICULT TO ATTRACT non black votes, plain and simple. Granger cannot want to head of the PNC and say it was okay to use the army to murder people just to steal an election.

 

 

Both you and Redux are behaving just like the PPP boys. Time and again you have the habit of saying that because we are Indians we do not know what blacks are going through. Sometimes you even go farther to say that Indians cannot speak for blacks because we are not blacks.

 

If this is not racist then I beg to see what is racist.

And it is also plain and simple that if the PNC apologizes to Indians and doesn't address the issue that blacks in general and poor blacks in particular feel then they will LOSE votes.

 

The problem with people like you and Kari is that you have this habit of taking black people for granted.

 

If you want the PNC to win votes then they need to stop being the party of "NO", and start being the party of IDEAS.  IDEAS that will address the socio-economic concerns of ALL sectors of Guyanese.

 

If that is not enough to woo some Indians to their side then Indians deserve what they get.  The PPP!

 

 

 

FM

 

 CaribJ, it's not about the Indians getting the PPP (what they deserve). They already got it. They ain't the problem. Indians will survive no matter what -whether they get the screws form Burnham or the PPP.

 

PNC's great ideas mean beans when Indians will always vote PPP. They are the majority, man.

 

The PNC can't address anybody's issues until they are in a position to. That is why the Indians losing this mistrust is the Key.

 

Got a problem with this logic?

Kari
Originally Posted by Chief:
.

Race has certainly blind some of you. How the hell an apology by the PNC is apology from blacks to Indians?

If you ask this question you really don't know Guyana.  Why do you think that APNU got 41% of its votes, including maybe over 90% of the black votes?  RACE.  Ditto the PPP, so anything that either party does is seen through the lens of race.

FM
Originally Posted by Kari:

 

 CaribJ, it's not about the Indians getting the PPP (what they deserve). .

So whats your issue because nothing out of your mouth is designed to help black people.

 

Just leave things as they are.  If G/town and its environs become over run by criminal gangs and a disaffected populace just let it be. I know that you think that  down town Kingston Jamaica, and parts of Port of Spain are wonderful and you just wish Georgetown and some surrounding communities to be just like them.

 

Just remember that not every one can afford to pay for militias.

 

By the way Indians aren't the majority.  We have two large minority groups, but you think that only one of them matters.

 

Work out the maths here.  The PNC grovels to Indians by apologizing.  They pick up a few Indian votes.  Large numbers of the black masses think that Granger is pulling a Hoyte or a Corbin, and so don't vote PNC.

 

Where does that leave the PNC?  I know the PPP will do anything to make black people stay home, and what you suggest will definitely guarantee that.

FM
Last edited by Former Member
Originally Posted by Kari:

.

CaribJ, I see the same trait in Redux to unravel reality from passion. What about the PPP's electoral dominance escapes you?.

Kari you live in an Indo Guyanese world and are clearly not privy to much of the conversation going on.

 

1.  Africans of all classes feel threatened by what they see as social, economic and political genocide.  When they complain they are demonized, much as you and Chief are attempting to do to me and redux now.  Unfortunately for you this isn't Guyana, so your attempt to demonize falls flat.

 

2. A younger generation of Africans are now arising.  People who do NOT know what life in the 80s was all about.  They hang to the myths of the early 70s when black people were better off than they are today and they credit Burnham for it.  They view attempts to discredit Burnham as an attempt to discredit a black hero.

 

3.  Most of them don't care who is in power.  They vote PNC only because they feel that this is the only entity which they think can contain INDIAN power, and dominance.

 

4.  Telling them that most Indians aren't any better off falls on deaf ears.  they see a land of tremendous inequality with the money in Indian hands. Rural Indian poverty is too remote and not visible  to them.

 

BOTTOM line is that your suggestion about black people apologizing to Indians is dangerous, unless you balance it with a similar apology of Indians to blacks.

 

Or better yet, just abandon this whole apology nonsense.

 

APNU will get votes when they convince Guyanese of all races that, not only do they have ideas, but that they will use their power in parliament to IMPLEMENT these ideas, and to go to the people if blocked by the PPP.

 

Now if doing this means that they aren't going to get Indians support then they aren't going to get it any way.

 

 

 

 

FM
Originally Posted by caribny:
Originally Posted by Kari:

.

CaribJ, I see the same trait in Redux to unravel reality from passion. What about the PPP's electoral dominance escapes you?.

Kari you live in an Indo Guyanese world and are clearly not privy to much of the conversation going on.

 

1.  Africans of all classes feel threatened by what they see as social, economic and political genocide.  When they complain they are demonized, much as you and Chief are attempting to do to me and redux now.  Unfortunately for you this isn't Guyana, so your attempt to demonize falls flat.

 

2. A younger generation of Africans are now arising.  People who do NOT know what life in the 80s was all about.  They hang to the myths of the early 70s when black people were better off than they are today and they credit Burnham for it.  They view attempts to discredit Burnham as an attempt to discredit a black hero.

 

3.  Most of them don't care who is in power.  They vote PNC only because they feel that this is the only entity which they think can contain INDIAN power, and dominance.

 

4.  Telling them that most Indians aren't any better off falls on deaf ears.  they see a land of tremendous inequality with the money in Indian hands. Rural Indian poverty is too remote and not visible  to them.

 

BOTTOM line is that your suggestion about black people apologizing to Indians is dangerous, unless you balance it with a similar apology of Indians to blacks.

 

Or better yet, just abandon this whole apology nonsense.

 

APNU will get votes when they convince Guyanese of all races that, not only do they have ideas, but that they will use their power in parliament to IMPLEMENT these ideas, and to go to the people if blocked by the PPP.

 

Now if doing this means that they aren't going to get Indians support then they aren't going to get it any way.

 

 

 

 

1.   Guyanese  of all classes feel threatened by what they see as social, economic and political genocide.

 

 

2. A younger generation of Guyanese are now arising.  People who do NOT know what life in the 80s was all about.  They hang to the myths of the early 70s when black people were better off than they are today and they credit Burnham for it.  They view attempts to discredit Burnham as an attempt to discredit a black hero.

 

By you and Redux claiming that an apology by the PNC is an apology by blacks to Indians, you are feeding   Indians  the myth that every blackman was  bad and was a  a PNC member.  Do you see how dangerous is you your stupid assumption. I repeat you are no different than the PPP coolie racists.

 

 

 

Chief
Originally Posted by Chief:
.

 

1.   Guyanese  of all classes feel threatened by what they see as social, economic and political genocide.

 

 

2. A younger generation of Guyanese are now arising.  People who do NOT know what life in the 80s was all about.  They hang to the myths of the early 70s when black people were better off than they are today and they credit Burnham for it.  They view attempts to discredit Burnham as an attempt to discredit a black hero.

 

By you and Redux claiming that an apology by the PNC is an apology by blacks to Indians, you are feeding   Indians  the myth that every blackman was  bad and was a  a PNC member.  Do you see how dangerous is you your stupid assumption. I repeat you are no different than the PPP coolie racists.

 

 

 

 

 

 

You know most Indians already demonize black people as PNC supporters, and I don't even know if they are wrong when we look at the votes.

 

Chief. Most Indians vote PPP and most blacks vote PNC.  They vote because of RACE.  So quit trying to put lipstick on a pig and pretend that it is pretty.  If black people hear the PNC saying "we apologize to Indians" this will be seen as groveling to them. 

 

Most of those "Guyanese" of Indian descent voted PPP, so what is your point?  Obviously they are happy with them, or consider them to be the lesser of two evils.  Given that they voted for the PPP then they ought to be happy with what the PPP has done for or to them.  If they don't like what the PPP is doing then they ought to vote for some one else, even if it is a protest vote.

 

As an example I am incensed with how Cuomo is taking the NYC vote for granted as he tries to placate the suburbanites and Upstate.  I will register a protest vote for some minor party to send him a message that he shouldn't take my NYC vote for granted. 

 

Cuomo will soon have his sycophants telling us how horrible the GOP is.  This will not lead to me supporting his behavior when I don't.  We need to step beyond our fears.  I really don't care what the GOP says, because I don't like their policies, and they will not get my support until they change.  But this doesn't mean that Cuomo can terrify me to vote for him, when he isn't doing anything to earn my vote.

 

So if Indians don't like the PPP then they ought to register this by changing their voting habits.  If they don't they will get the PPP so ought not complain about that.

 

BTW you got my laughing when you imply that Guyanese as a whole look to Burnham as a hero.  You really ought to have checked your post before sending it.  No this mythology of Burnham is confined to his former cronies, and to a young group of black people who don't know any better, and who are yearning for leaders who they don't see existing in Guyana.

 

And now and Kari want the PNC to grovel.  Hmmm.  The PPP will be happy as this will ensure that the black vote is subdued, and given who blacks vote for the PNC suffers. All on the chance that groveling might win them a few Indian votes.

 

Silly idea. 

 

Why not demand that APNU develop strong policies which benefit Indian constituencies like the rice farmers.  This while they develop policies for the interior, Linden, the youth, etc.

 

I support this and have said so.  If this doesn't earn them some support from the rice farmers, then they ought to stop whining about how they are being treated.

FM
Last edited by Former Member
Originally Posted by caribny:
Originally Posted by KishanB:
.

 

But does Granja want to win or is he going to PASS wind like Carobin?

Don't know if you are old enough to remember 1994,  I was in G/town during the local govt elections.  By 10 AM every one knew that the PNC had lost G/town and that Hammie Green had won.

 

Let APNU run behind the Indian vote, which there is no proof that they will get, and ignore the black vote (which they are very good at doing) and then a low voter turn out will guarantee the PPP its majority.  Please recall 2006 when blacks boycotted Corbin because they thought he was ignoring them.

 

 

I have given you two examples about how the PNC suffered because its base felt ignored.  I can assure you that an apology by the PNC to Indians, without a reciprocal apology by the PPP to blacks, will lead to the PPP romping home, as they did in 2006.    Hammie Green won G.town in 1994 because the black masses thought that Desi (Persaud) Hoyte had given away the country to "collie". 

 

Their current plight will ensure that these attitudes against perceived Indian dominance are even more entrenched.  They really don't care that most Indians are no better off than they are and that the Indian dominance which they see benefits only 5% of the Indian community.

 

So yes the Indian voters' fears must be addressed, but so should fears of the grass roots African voter.

1994- I would concede the point that South Georgetown voted against the elite elements of the PNC because they felt neglected but Hammie did a good job of mobilizing the thugs vs Hoyte not working hard enough to bring out his supporters.

 

Hammie got 10,000 votes vs Hoyte 8,000.  Georgetown had 70,000 eligible voters at that time?

 

So what are you rally talking about?

 

The GT people did not come out in their numbers to vote - but the thugs did.

 

 

 

In 2006, it had nothing to do with Afro-Guyanese feeling marginalized.

 

Let the record books show that Afro-Guyanese are the more aware voters in Guyana, they are more likely to vote on issues than race; they are more likely to abandon the PNC if they find an alternative.

 

They had little confidence in Corbain in 2006 since many of them knew he was selling guns to Jagdehoe.  A fair amount went for Raphael Trotman in 2006 who at the time they saw as a fresh face who was prepared to put all on the table and even apologise for the excesses of the 70's and 80's.

 

So this destroys your theory that they do not want an apology.

FM
Originally Posted by Kari:

 

 CaribJ, it's not about the Indians getting the PPP (what they deserve). They already got it. They ain't the problem. Indians will survive no matter what -whether they get the screws form Burnham or the PPP.

 

PNC's great ideas mean beans when Indians will always vote PPP. They are the majority, man.

 

The PNC can't address anybody's issues until they are in a position to. That is why the Indians losing this mistrust is the Key.

 

Got a problem with this logic?

let me parse your "logic" and deconstruct it so that the uninitiated can understand and not be fooled:

 

'Indians will always vote PPP because of people like y'all who so carefully cultivate the "mistrust" and the hate, demand apology from the weak and feed that demand and its fake 'justification' to the generations of Indo-Guyanese born after the death of Forbes Burnham or came of age in the era of PPP rule'

 

how else?

 

isn't it is interesting that all the proud Indo-racists on GNI, the posing PPP reformers here, and the execrable PPP Chronicle propagandists are of one will on this subject

 

this kind of stuff y'all engaging in is so mealy-mouthed, so racially tendentious and intellectually dishonest that it brings into sharp focus the skimpiness of the democratic, non-tribal bona fides being fielded by many AFC 'well-wishers' whose biggest disappointment is that Moses, Khemraj and Nigel et al did not play the role of PPP lite - designated polishers for the rough edges of Guyana's tribal hegemon

 

kishan/rev at least has the 'honesty' to cop to intent to destroy the PNC in at least one of the personality modes he 'entertains' us with on this BB

 

do Basil Williams, James Bond and the not insignificant multitude of visionless and corrupt clowns in APNU thrill me? . . . not really

 

truth be told . . . i am no fan of David Granger, but i don't regard him as a threat to democracy in Guyana either

 

if there is a genuine appetite to discipline the PPP by moving them to the opposition benches, i suggest y'all stop investing in dividing the people with sly appeals for sanctification of victimhood and expend your energies educating folks about the benefits of change, strong/independent institutions, coalition building, and divided government under a proper constitution

 

true democracy in the current dispensation can ONLY come about with the REMOVAL of the PPP from executive power - at least for a while . . . it is the only thing that can build momentum for true constitutional reform and bring a sea change in the way politics is conducted in Guyana

 

the AFC is key to this process . . . with all their faults, they are the essential ingredient

 

unfortunately, i am not optimistic regarding my appeal to abjure tribalism . . . i rather suspect that 15 years from now [God forbid the gangster regime is still in power], when the last of the old codger PNC leaders are long gone from the scene, the slightly less old-codger, 'former PPP' usual suspects here will still be wringing their hands telling a bewildered generation of Afro-Guyanese in the throes of insurrection that they need to apologize for Burnham as the price of Indo-Guyanese favor

 

the exercise of powah with all its contemp for the other . . . save us from these 'friends of Democracy'

FM
Last edited by Former Member
Originally Posted by baseman:
Originally Posted by ksazma:
Originally Posted by Kari:
 

Kzaaaz get out of the last century.

I have. Unfortunately I don't think the PNC have. That is their burden. I have no obligation to trust anyone I feel don't deserve that trust.

The PNC cadre of ex-military campaigners in 2011 exposed the true intent and fraud of the PNC.  Their open message, cheer the AFC, split the Indian vote but "come home" on voting day.  When we win, we will use the military to ensure we (PNC) never ever leaves power again.  xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx A key PNC operative told me in 2011, when/if the PNC wins, the will give Finance and Economics to the AFC, the PNC will own the GDF/GPF and all aspects of law are order and foreign policy.

 

\ BASEMAN ANOTHER LIE FROM COKE-IN-DE-POKE SPECIALIST. PEOPLE WOULD HAVE ONLY BELIEVE YOUR LIE..... IF THE AFC DID NOT TELL THE GUYANESE BEFORE, DURING AND AFTER THE ELECTIONS ........THE AFC REFUSE TO JOIN PPP OR PNC TO FORM A GOVT. xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx The PNC must never be allowed to rule over Guyana again as long as they and the military are tied at the hip.  I want o trust the PNC, but cannot and no Indian should either.


BASEMAN ..........ANIL MOTHER IN LAW WUKING WITH THE SAME GDF, POLICE, CUSTOMS & CANU TO EXPAND DE COKE-IN-DE-POKE OPERATIONS OUT OF GUYANA.
FM

In a country where politicians, on the one hand, determined to sustain distinct ethnic groups for vote banking but are faced with the reality that a significant of them little Kulli girls want a black balata especially in the environment where nuff East Indian boys are wasting their life away behind DDL (drink drunk and lie down), the nation is stuck with a new dispensation.

 

This new dispensation is a challenge for the politicians who wanted to stay in the racial camps - what to do with the mixed race who can swing politically anyside.

 

The PPP has been the first out of the blocks to embrace the mixed population with a great failure rate since these mixed people are more likely to be at the bottom of the economic ladder and blame the PPP for their economic situation.

 

The PNC has been most uninspiring since it is slowly but surely evoling to a party of pensioners (Hammie is more than a pensioner - he is 83 years old) and the new blood is not going to Congress Place after observing what they did to people like Aubrey Northon, Vincent Alexander, James Mac Calister, Sherwood Lowe who were all strong grassroots leaders.

 

The AFC to date is struggling to get its GREAT message out since some in that party is obsessed with control and thus continue to keep the party small.

 

So what is the young people to do?

FM
QUOTE......The AFC to date is struggling to get its GREAT message out since some in that party is obsessed with control and thus continue to keep the party small. XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Both Trotman & Ramjattan need to be reminded they had their chance ,,,,..and the BOTH failed to shake the PPP or PNC to really make a difference. XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX If Moses & Ralph and those who want to clean up the PPP.......were to team up with Faith Hardine, Bulkhan and some of the young grassroot leaders in the PNC......................Trotman, Ramjattan, plus....PPP & PNC will all be history. XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX And there will be need for any apology from PPP or PNC........or explination from Ramjattan Or Trotman.
FM
Originally Posted by redux:
Originally Posted by Kari:

 

 CaribJ, it's not about the Indians getting the PPP (what they deserve). They already got it. They ain't the problem. Indians will survive no matter what -whether they get the screws form Burnham or the PPP.

 

PNC's great ideas mean beans when Indians will always vote PPP. They are the majority, man.

 

The PNC can't address anybody's issues until they are in a position to. That is why the Indians losing this mistrust is the Key.

 

Got a problem with this logic?

let me parse your "logic" and deconstruct it so that the uninitiated can understand and not be fooled:

 

'Indians will always vote PPP because of people like y'all who so carefully cultivate the "mistrust" and the hate, demand apology from the weak and feed that demand and its fake 'justification' to the generations of Indo-Guyanese born after the death of Forbes Burnham or came of age in the era of PPP rule'

 

how else?

 

isn't it is interesting that all the proud Indo-racists on GNI, the posing PPP reformers here, and the execrable PPP Chronicle propagandists are of one will on this subject

 

this kind of stuff y'all engaging in is so mealy-mouthed, so racially tendentious and intellectually dishonest that it brings into sharp focus the skimpiness of the democratic, non-tribal bona fides being fielded by many AFC 'well-wishers' whose biggest disappointment is that Moses, Khemraj and Nigel et al did not play the role of PPP lite - designated polishers for the rough edges of Guyana's tribal hegemon

 

kishan/rev at least has the 'honesty' to cop to intent to destroy the PNC in at least one of the personality modes he 'entertains' us with on this BB

 

do Basil Williams, James Bond and the not insignificant multitude of visionless and corrupt clowns in APNU thrill me? . . . not really

 

truth be told . . . i am no fan of David Granger, but i don't regard him as a threat to democracy in Guyana either

 

if there is a genuine appetite to discipline the PPP by moving them to the opposition benches, i suggest y'all stop investing in dividing the people with sly appeals for sanctification of victimhood and expend your energies educating folks about the benefits of change, strong/independent institutions, coalition building, and divided government under a proper constitution

 

true democracy in the current dispensation can ONLY come about with the REMOVAL of the PPP from executive power - at least for a while . . . it is the only thing that can build momentum for true constitutional reform and bring a sea change in the way politics is conducted in Guyana

 

the AFC is key to this process . . . with all their faults, they are the essential ingredient

 

unfortunately, i am not optimistic regarding my appeal to abjure tribalism . . . i rather suspect that 15 years from now [God forbid the gangster regime is still in power], when the last of the old codger PNC leaders are long gone from the scene, the slightly less old-codger, 'former PPP' usual suspects here will still be wringing their hands telling a bewildered generation of Afro-Guyanese in the throes of insurrection that they need to apologize for Burnham as the price of Indo-Guyanese favor

 

the exercise of powah with all its contemp for the other . . . save us from these 'friends of Democracy'

Wow!

 

Are you Dr. David Hinds?

S
Originally Posted by ksazma:
Originally Posted by caribny:
Originally Posted by ksazma:
.

So yuh don't believe in talking things over? In negotiations? Does it have to be violence?

You don't get my point do you.  Nice middle class people negotiate.  The lumpen proletariat who feel abandoned by the nice middle class people who control APNu and the AFC, don't.

 

So I suggest that you, Kari, and baseman who think that the future of Guyana lies in appeasing Indians because of what you claim that the PNC did to them FORTY years ago, and ignoring the most impoverished blacks, are doomed to be very disappointed.

 

Will you wait to negotiate at a time when Granger has COMPLETELY lost control, this when the lumpen proletariat call him David Persaud, because he doesn't fit into some idealized fantasy that many of these youths who know nothing of the 80s have of Burnham?

 

Guyana is headed in a fearsome direction and it is sad that too many are locked into their own ethnocentric fantasies to notice this.

You don't have any point. The Indians did not resort to street violence during the PNC rule when they were being marginalized. They waited patiently and continued praying for relief. Eventually Burnham died and Hoyte was forced to make the 1985 elections the last rigged one. Why must you call for blacks to resort to street violence?

Old ways never die. The old sentiment of anything for power is alive and well among the Afro masses.  If not for the pressure of Jimmy Carter, the PNC would have happily carried on rigging.  They had perfected the art which had become their operating norm.  Brutalizing, abusing and oppressing Indians was simply, "law and order", PNC style.  We were viewed as an unwanted occupying force by Afros.  I repeat, this mentality is alive and well among Afros.

FM
Originally Posted by seignet:
Originally Posted by redux:
Originally Posted by Kari:

 

 CaribJ, it's not about the Indians getting the PPP (what they deserve). They already got it. They ain't the problem. Indians will survive no matter what -whether they get the screws form Burnham or the PPP.

 

PNC's great ideas mean beans when Indians will always vote PPP. They are the majority, man.

 

The PNC can't address anybody's issues until they are in a position to. That is why the Indians losing this mistrust is the Key.

 

Got a problem with this logic?

let me parse your "logic" and deconstruct it so that the uninitiated can understand and not be fooled:

 

'Indians will always vote PPP because of people like y'all who so carefully cultivate the "mistrust" and the hate, demand apology from the weak and feed that demand and its fake 'justification' to the generations of Indo-Guyanese born after the death of Forbes Burnham or came of age in the era of PPP rule'

 

how else?

 

isn't it is interesting that all the proud Indo-racists on GNI, the posing PPP reformers here, and the execrable PPP Chronicle propagandists are of one will on this subject

 

this kind of stuff y'all engaging in is so mealy-mouthed, so racially tendentious and intellectually dishonest that it brings into sharp focus the skimpiness of the democratic, non-tribal bona fides being fielded by many AFC 'well-wishers' whose biggest disappointment is that Moses, Khemraj and Nigel et al did not play the role of PPP lite - designated polishers for the rough edges of Guyana's tribal hegemon

 

kishan/rev at least has the 'honesty' to cop to intent to destroy the PNC in at least one of the personality modes he 'entertains' us with on this BB

 

do Basil Williams, James Bond and the not insignificant multitude of visionless and corrupt clowns in APNU thrill me? . . . not really

 

truth be told . . . i am no fan of David Granger, but i don't regard him as a threat to democracy in Guyana either

 

if there is a genuine appetite to discipline the PPP by moving them to the opposition benches, i suggest y'all stop investing in dividing the people with sly appeals for sanctification of victimhood and expend your energies educating folks about the benefits of change, strong/independent institutions, coalition building, and divided government under a proper constitution

 

true democracy in the current dispensation can ONLY come about with the REMOVAL of the PPP from executive power - at least for a while . . . it is the only thing that can build momentum for true constitutional reform and bring a sea change in the way politics is conducted in Guyana

 

the AFC is key to this process . . . with all their faults, they are the essential ingredient

 

unfortunately, i am not optimistic regarding my appeal to abjure tribalism . . . i rather suspect that 15 years from now [God forbid the gangster regime is still in power], when the last of the old codger PNC leaders are long gone from the scene, the slightly less old-codger, 'former PPP' usual suspects here will still be wringing their hands telling a bewildered generation of Afro-Guyanese in the throes of insurrection that they need to apologize for Burnham as the price of Indo-Guyanese favor

 

the exercise of powah with all its contemp for the other . . . save us from these 'friends of Democracy'

Wow!

 

Are you Dr. David Hinds?

what a dumb question . . . i don't even know the man

FM

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×